We’ve posted a new Expert Spotlight! Joe Anderson (DatabaseMX) has been on Experts Exchange since 2006. Learn more about this database architect, guitar aficionado, and Microsoft MVP.
Why can any fraction whose denominator has only 2s and 5s in its prime factorization can be written as a terminating decimal?
Why can any fraction whose denominator has only 2s and 5s in its prime factorization can be written as a terminating decimal?
This is 7th grade math question. It's not a homework problem.
Thank you!
This is 7th grade math question. It's not a homework problem.
Thank you!
Do more with
EXPERT OFFICE® is a registered trademark of EXPERTS EXCHANGE®
Notice that 1/10 is half of 1/5 (since 1/5 = 2/10). If you have any number 1/(5*5*...*5), then you can convert that to (2*2*...2)/(10*10*...10); and numbers that have only 10's in the denominator just move the decimal point of the integer numerator.
Notice that 1/(2*2*...*2) = (1/2)*(1/2)*...*(1/2); and each factor is just 0.5, which when all multiplied together is just a non-repeating decimal. Or, alternatively, as above, notice that:
1/(2*2*...*2) = (5*5*...*5)/(10*10*...10),
Notice that 1/(2*2*...*2) = (1/2)*(1/2)*...*(1/2); and each factor is just 0.5, which when all multiplied together is just a non-repeating decimal. Or, alternatively, as above, notice that:
1/(2*2*...*2) = (5*5*...*5)/(10*10*...10),
If this is a 7th grade problem, I assume that naseeam wants a very simple answer as first provided. ... Thinkpads_User
fraction whose denominator has only 2s and 5s in its prime factorization
can be produced by multiplying together numbers with a terminating decimal part of .5, .2 or .0
can be produced by multiplying together numbers with a terminating decimal part of .5, .2 or .0
"Why can any fraction whose denominator has only 2s and 5s in its prime factorization can be written as a terminating decimal?"
-
To be perfectly correct you must define "fraction" a bit narrower.
9/3 terminates
-
To be perfectly correct you must define "fraction" a bit narrower.
9/3 terminates
"3 does not have only 2s and 5s in its prime factorization, so whether 9/3 terminates is irrelevant. "
true
But it is relvant when considering the converse (I know, that was not asked)
true
But it is relvant when considering the converse (I know, that was not asked)
I would refer you to Hardy & Wright's "Theory of Numbers" Oxford University Press chapter 9 page 107 and sequence. The proof of the following theorem is laid out there and is a bit too long winded to reproduce here
Theorem 135
The decimal for a rational number p/q between 0 and 1 [ie: a fraction] is terminating or recurring, and any terminating or recurring decimal is equal to a rational number. If (p,q)=1 [ie: relatively prime] and q=2^a5^b [2 to the power alpha and 5 to the power beta] and the max(a,b)=µ, then the decimal terminates after µ digits. If (p,q)=1 and q=2^a5^b*Q where Q>1 and (Q,10)=1, and v is the order of 10 mod Q, then the decimal contains µ non-recurring digits and v recurring digits.
The comments in square brackets [] are mine. The proof requires another rather complicated theorem (88) given on page 71.
The proof is NOT a 7th grade maths question.
Theorem 135
The decimal for a rational number p/q between 0 and 1 [ie: a fraction] is terminating or recurring, and any terminating or recurring decimal is equal to a rational number. If (p,q)=1 [ie: relatively prime] and q=2^a5^b [2 to the power alpha and 5 to the power beta] and the max(a,b)=µ, then the decimal terminates after µ digits. If (p,q)=1 and q=2^a5^b*Q where Q>1 and (Q,10)=1, and v is the order of 10 mod Q, then the decimal contains µ non-recurring digits and v recurring digits.
The comments in square brackets [] are mine. The proof requires another rather complicated theorem (88) given on page 71.
The proof is NOT a 7th grade maths question.
If we use the idea that the product of 2 non-repeating numbers is non-repeating then
(1) Since 1/2 =0.5
then 1/2^n is non-repeating
Similarly
Since 1/5 =0.2
then 1/5^m is non-repeating
(2) Since 1/2^n and 1/5^m are non repeating
then 1/(2^n*5^m) is no repeating
(3) Since 1/(2^n*5^m) are non-repeating then, where A is an integer,
A/(2^n*5^m) is non-repeating
Hence all fractions whose denominators are of the form 2^n*5^m are non-repeating.
(1) Since 1/2 =0.5
then 1/2^n is non-repeating
Similarly
Since 1/5 =0.2
then 1/5^m is non-repeating
(2) Since 1/2^n and 1/5^m are non repeating
then 1/(2^n*5^m) is no repeating
(3) Since 1/(2^n*5^m) are non-repeating then, where A is an integer,
A/(2^n*5^m) is non-repeating
Hence all fractions whose denominators are of the form 2^n*5^m are non-repeating.
For this to be anywhere close to a Grade 7 question it would have to be of the form:-
(Q) Show that 1/(2^6*5^6) is a non-repeating fraction.
(A) 1/(2^6*5^6) = 1/10^6 = 0.0000001
or possibly
(Q) Show that 1/(2^8*5^6) is a non-repeating fraction.
(A) 1/(2^8*5^6) = 1/(2^2*10^6) = (1/4)*(1/10^6)
= 0.25*0.0000001 = 0.000000025
(Q) Show that 1/(2^6*5^6) is a non-repeating fraction.
(A) 1/(2^6*5^6) = 1/10^6 = 0.0000001
or possibly
(Q) Show that 1/(2^8*5^6) is a non-repeating fraction.
(A) 1/(2^8*5^6) = 1/(2^2*10^6) = (1/4)*(1/10^6)
= 0.25*0.0000001 = 0.000000025
... Thinkpads_User said
"All covering the same ground over and over again here." Not quite
you said
"Any number you can divide by 2 or divide by 5 terminates (does not repeat). . "
but that is not really an answer to the question asked (which was Why?
furthermore consider a number (you said ANY number so try 1/3)
(1/3)/2 = 0.16666666....
does not terminate. so at best you have to expand your answer a bit.
The other answers tried (and eventually did) answer the why?
.
"All covering the same ground over and over again here." Not quite
you said
"Any number you can divide by 2 or divide by 5 terminates (does not repeat). . "
but that is not really an answer to the question asked (which was Why?
furthermore consider a number (you said ANY number so try 1/3)
(1/3)/2 = 0.16666666....
does not terminate. so at best you have to expand your answer a bit.
The other answers tried (and eventually did) answer the why?
.
Premium Content
You need an Expert Office subscription to comment.Start Free Trial