• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 360
  • Last Modified:

Storage format / engine for my database

I have a data set with ~7 million 32-character strings.  I am trying to find the most efficient storage for it.

It needs to be encrypted.
It needs fast searching.
It needs to be stand-alone.
It needs to be as compact as possible for online distribution.

I have tried Absolute Database but the resulting data file is about 800K.
I tried mOrmot SQLite3 and the data file is about 400K.
I tried a simple in-memory string list but it gobbles up about 450K of RAM.

What are my options?
0
DSOM
Asked:
DSOM
  • 7
  • 3
  • 2
  • +1
1 Solution
 
Geert GruwezOracle dbaCommented:
have you got any realistic numbers of what to expect ?

32x7000000 chars = 224000000 bytes (or 213 Mb)

400K / 213Mb is a factor of 1/532,
so thats a very good compression factor by the look of it

it looks like you already have what you look for

or is there an other problem ?
0
 
DSOMAuthor Commented:
I don't know what to expect or what my options are which is why I asked.

I am hoping there might be something more suitable that I haven't found yet.

If it is indeed the best option that is fine too, I just need to know it.
0
 
Gerald ConnollyCommented:
Well, i guess it depends on what you are really doing with this.

213MBytes  (NB "b" = bits, "B" = Bytes) is a tiny database and you would have to go back probably 10 years to find a memory stick it couldnt fit on!
Even on 4Mb broadband it will only take 5 minutes or so to download.

Why does it need to be compressed? It will just make it slower to access.
0
Industry Leaders: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

 
DSOMAuthor Commented:
It only needs to be compressed during distribution/installation.  It is expanded on the end-users' computer.

Ugh, I just realized what I did.  Posting when tired and not braining properly.

It doesn't look like I can edit my original question.  Should have been:

I have tried Absolute Database but the resulting data file is about 800MB.
I tried mOrmot SQLite3 and the data file is about 400MB.
I tried a simple in-memory string list but it gobbles up about 450MB of RAM.
0
 
Sinisa VukCommented:
How does your strings look like? Is it something like hex numbers? or just random characters.
0
 
Gerald ConnollyCommented:
why is 800MB a problem?

How are you distributing this db and how often are there updates?
0
 
DSOMAuthor Commented:
It is too big.  Customers still on slow connections or even dialup have problems with it.  The download installer at almost 1GB is using up almost 5TB a month in bandwidth.  That is just for the initial distribution/installation.

It is being distributed via my website.  Updates are daily but just incrementally so that isn't a big problem.
0
 
Geert GruwezOracle dbaCommented:
have you tried putting the strings in a text file and zipping it ?
zip is very good at text compression
0
 
DSOMAuthor Commented:
I tried using a compressed string list.  But it takes up too much RAM when loaded.  From my original question "I tried a simple in-memory string list but it gobbles up about 450MB of RAM."
0
 
DSOMAuthor Commented:
I am trying SynSQLite3 right now and it looks promising.  About 500MB on disk and almost zero memory footprint.  That database will compress down to about 300MB for distribution which is a huge improvement over almost 1GB.
0
 
Geert GruwezOracle dbaCommented:
lol, i wasn't meaning for you to load as a stringlist
>> my idea was:
put all your text in a file.txt
> zip this file.txt

when you start your app or appinstaller:
> unzip the file
> load it into a database in the local environment

the local environment could be a company which hosts an enterprise database like sql server, oracle, etc ...
that way you can have 1 dictionary (at least i think it's a dictionary)
for all pc's in 1 local environment and you'd only have to do the upload once
and set the connection string on the others

>> i know it's a differrent ball game like this
0
 
DSOMAuthor Commented:
When I do an incremental update it is a zipped text file that is imported.  However the original distribution contains the full current database.  The end-user won't have a database server aside from the one I run which they access over the Internet.  This isn't for enterprise customers, it's average home users.

The database on the customer's home computer is a stand-alone SQL database.
0
 
DSOMAuthor Commented:
This has ended up being the best option
0

Featured Post

Hire Technology Freelancers with Gigs

Work with freelancers specializing in everything from database administration to programming, who have proven themselves as experts in their field. Hire the best, collaborate easily, pay securely, and get projects done right.

  • 7
  • 3
  • 2
  • +1
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now