BeGentleWithMe-INeedHelp
asked on
Trying to understand IMAP and outlook on a SLOW Vista machine
trying to understand where the slowdown with outlook 2010 on a vista machine with 6 email accounts - 3 hosted by gmail and set as IMAP in outlook (gmail is set for imap AND POP. is it ok to have gmail set for both?).
and 3 accounts hosted by godaddy and set as POP accounts in outlook.
account 1 on gmail:
gmail says they are using 8.4GB
The PST in outlook says:
size without folders: 0
size with folders: 1.9GB
then there's folders/subfolders listed with 2 columns size and total size.
like:
size total size
gmail 0 16GB
gmail / all mail 8.7 gb 8.7GB
etc.
then local subfolders?
inbox 3.6GB 3.6GB
etc.
and the PST is only 1.5GB?!
any of that make sense?
That's similar for all the mailboxes - weird numbers and slow performance.
compacting takes a long time / never finishes.
any advice?
and 3 accounts hosted by godaddy and set as POP accounts in outlook.
account 1 on gmail:
gmail says they are using 8.4GB
The PST in outlook says:
size without folders: 0
size with folders: 1.9GB
then there's folders/subfolders listed with 2 columns size and total size.
like:
size total size
gmail 0 16GB
gmail / all mail 8.7 gb 8.7GB
etc.
then local subfolders?
inbox 3.6GB 3.6GB
etc.
and the PST is only 1.5GB?!
any of that make sense?
That's similar for all the mailboxes - weird numbers and slow performance.
compacting takes a long time / never finishes.
any advice?
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
ASKER
thanks. You say you've seen PSTs with 10 - 15 GB. His several likely total that high. So where would you begin to troubleshoot why the machines come to a slow crawl when outlook is open?
This is the same poor performance on both the desktop and laptop (windows 7 and vista). So the common issue is the several large mailboxes.
I'm curious how the experts would deal with that poor performance.
This is the same poor performance on both the desktop and laptop (windows 7 and vista). So the common issue is the several large mailboxes.
I'm curious how the experts would deal with that poor performance.
ASKER
some other things I forgot to mention: it's a 4GB vista machine. is 4 GB for mailboxes so large enough?
What's your view of vista : ) ?
So you like imap more than POP?
>but IMAP is the preferable technology to use.
Exchange is similar to imap in that everything is stored on the server / some caching on the laptop, right?
He's got these mailboxes on a desktop also (which is also slow) and on his phone he says.
Is exchange a better answer than imap?
He has seperate PSTs for each IMAP and POP mail account. are there pros / cons for a single PST? office 2010 PST max size is 50GB?
i read about hosted exchange mailboxes that come with 25GB max folder size. but performance suffers with that much mail, right?
thanks!