Solved

HP Smart Array  421i: Better I/O Performance

Posted on 2013-01-05
4
1,669 Views
Last Modified: 2013-01-07
Infrastructure:
HP DL380p G8
Smart Array P420i Controller with 512MB FBWC
vmWare ESXi 5.1,  SBS 2011

1. Issue
Up and running a Array RAID 5 with 3 x 600GB 10k SAS.
Now we add  3 x 600GB 10k.
How will we have better Perfomance?
a) Add these 3 Disks to the existing Array
b) A new Array RAID 5
c) Other solution

2. Issue
Installation of  2GB FBWC Option for P420i Controller.
That these bring Perfomance?
0
Comment
Question by:perolin
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
4 Comments
 
LVL 47

Expert Comment

by:David
ID: 38746917
The answer ... it depends.   What is ratio of reads vs. writes vs. random vs. sequential?    Are you married to RAID5?  RAID10 will outperform RAID5 on every benchmark except for a few contrived I/O tests that pretty much never happen in the real world.
0
 
LVL 1

Assisted Solution

by:mvirnoche
mvirnoche earned 200 total points
ID: 38746945
If you can lose all the data you could go for a RAID10 setup although I've seen RAID5 perform faster in my personal setups. You could either stripe the initial RAID5 onto a new RAID5 making it a RAID50; you could just re-initialize the whole thing into one large RAID5 which is what I have done before.
0
 
LVL 56

Accepted Solution

by:
andyalder earned 300 total points
ID: 38747097
RAID 10 would certainly be faster for writes and you can convert from RAID 5 to RAID 10 on the fly after adding the disks. Depending on your version of VMware you may need to reboot to the ACU to kick off the array expansion but you can re-start VMware before the expansion has completed. If you do not know the I/O profile then it's generally best to just have one array with everything running on it, if you were to split it up so Exchange for example got its own disks then when Exchange was quiet the other VMs couldn't benefit from the extra IOPS those dedicated disks would give.
0
 
LVL 2

Author Closing Comment

by:perolin
ID: 38750590
Thanks for Comments
0

Featured Post

Get 15 Days FREE Full-Featured Trial

Benefit from a mission critical IT monitoring with Monitis Premium or get it FREE for your entry level monitoring needs.
-Over 200,000 users
-More than 300,000 websites monitored
-Used in 197 countries
-Recommended by 98% of users

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

More or less everybody in the IT market understands the basics of Networking, however when we start talking about Storage Networks, things get a bit dizzier, and this is where I would like to help.
Hyper-convergence systems have taken the IT world by storm and have quickly started to change our point of view of how the data center should and could be architected. In this article, I’ll explain the benefits of employing a hyper-converged system …
NetCrunch network monitor is a highly extensive platform for network monitoring and alert generation. In this video you'll see a live demo of NetCrunch with most notable features explained in a walk-through manner. You'll also get to know the philos…
Visualize your data even better in Access queries. Given a date and a value, this lesson shows how to compare that value with the previous value, calculate the difference, and display a circle if the value is the same, an up triangle if it increased…

623 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question