Should Models use EventAggregator in MVVM?

In an MVVM architecture, the ViewModels use the EventAggregator to communicate between each other.

Should the Models use the EventAggregator to inform the ViewModels about any changes in the properties in the Model? If not, what should the Model use or do to inform the ViewModels about any changes in the data?
Who is Participating?
TommySzalapskiConnect With a Mentor Commented:
Yes. You are reading the diagram correctly. One issue I have with the diagram is he wrote "pure data" under Model which implies that it is passive. If it's sending change notifications, it is clearly more than just "pure data."

If you want to be able to have the Model tell the ViewModel things, you need some kind of way for the ViewModel to listen. You can use interrupts (not suggested) or a listener thread (push) or some kind of polling (pull).

Polling is when the ViewModel periodically checks with the Model to see if it changed. This may be what you want.

I still don't see why you need to notify the ViewModel when the Model changes though. The ViewModel should just know when it needs data and go get it.
Manoj PatilSr. Software EngineerCommented:
No. The ViewModel should have an instance of the model and can just call into it with accessors. The ViewModel is supposed to be the mediator between the View and the Model and should be able to communicate easily with both.
Keep up with what's happening at Experts Exchange!

Sign up to receive Decoded, a new monthly digest with product updates, feature release info, continuing education opportunities, and more.

xenonnAuthor Commented:
@TommySzalapski: However, when a data changes in the Model class, it needs to dispatch an event to inform the ViewModel about the change. It isn't efficient to make the ViewModel to continously polling on the Model through calling the Model's accessors to check for changes in the data.

Hence, I am not sure if the Model should use the ViewModel's normal Event Aggregator, the Domain Event Aggregator, or the traditional C# delegate events to inform about its changes.
Are you using interrupts or do you have a listener thread in your ViewModel? I don't think the Model should need to alert the ViewModel of anything. When the user clicks on something in the View, it should request the information from the Model through the ViewModel. Then the ViewModel goes and gets it. The Model doesn't need to alert the ViewModel when something changes.
xenonnAuthor Commented:
If this were the case, how would the UI be informed if there is a change in the Model?

I am referring to a diagram here:

In the diagram, I'm understanding it as the Model is implementing the INotifyProperty as a way to inform about its changes, isn't it? Or did I interpret it incorrectly?

I am not using interrupts or a listener thread in my ViewModel. I am implementing my own MVVM-like style for a game that I'm working on. I'm not using Prism or WPF, but just plain old C# code, except that I am designing and implementing the game with a MVVM design.
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.