We help IT Professionals succeed at work.

ZFS: some pracitical questions

janhoedt
janhoedt asked
on
365 Views
Last Modified: 2013-01-06
Hi,

I have some practical question on ZFS.

1.Hanccocka mentioned he has NFS + ISCSI running, why is that. Why ISCSI AND NFS?

2.What/how to do to configure ISCSI on the Nexenta (for the ESXi side: no problem)

3.If you add a CIFS-share: won't it impact the performance of the vm's? Or is this neglectable?

4.Does performance of ZFS get better after a while (when cache/logs are built) ...?

5.How many vm's do you have running on a ZFS NAS? I would like to run all my vm's but wonder if it could take it (will cache be more heavily used so it CAN take it or is it just the logic = less = the better performance)?
vm's I would like to run: windows 7 workstation, sql 2008, windows sccm, windows scom, vcenter 5, 2 domain controllers, 2 xenapp-servers, maybe also a windows 2012 and windows 8 as testdrive
=> therefore question 4, I had the impression performance got better after a while, just want to know if I'm over-exhausting zfs running all these vm's  (then I would run some on local ssd's in the esx-server) or I would not take advantage of what it's capable of

6.One more thing: what to do with 3 nic's in ZFS, use them all, only use two of them & how to configure then?

Please advise.
J.
Comment
Watch Question

VMware and Virtualization Consultant
CERTIFIED EXPERT
Fellow
Expert of the Year 2017
Commented:
This one is on us!
(Get your first solution completely free - no credit card required)
UNLOCK SOLUTION

Author

Commented:
1.ISCSI for "some" workloads, you wouldn't recommand it by default (for performance reasons, just as you would use vmxnet3, not e1000 as nic in vmware machines)?

2.great tutorial thanks!

3.ok, I might consider bringing all my data of my Synology over to ZFS

4. & 5. ?! wow, so performance is only impacted by lack of diskpace, not the amount of vm's?
40 or 50 vm's on 1 ZFS?

6.ok, might not be good option to add extra nic, however if I would add my data to it and backup over network + migrate vm's once and a while to other nas (synology), it might be still good option to add more nics, right?
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert PRO / EE Fellow)VMware and Virtualization Consultant
CERTIFIED EXPERT
Fellow
Expert of the Year 2017

Commented:
1. again wether you use iSCSI or NFS, it's up to you, Test, see which is better for you. It's not a ZFS SAN question, it's the age old question of NFS versus iSCSI.

2. no problems.

3. we use CIFs.

4 & 5. Yes, performs well for us on NFS.

6. Two NICs is always better than one. But in our tests, we've not been able to saturate a single 1GBe NIC, because of the performance on the server (cpu)
Unlock the solution to this question.
Join our community and discover your potential

Experts Exchange is the only place where you can interact directly with leading experts in the technology field. Become a member today and access the collective knowledge of thousands of technology experts.

*This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

OR

Please enter a first name

Please enter a last name

8+ characters (letters, numbers, and a symbol)

By clicking, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.