Avatar of janhoedt
janhoedt
 asked on

ZFS: some pracitical questions

Hi,

I have some practical question on ZFS.

1.Hanccocka mentioned he has NFS + ISCSI running, why is that. Why ISCSI AND NFS?

2.What/how to do to configure ISCSI on the Nexenta (for the ESXi side: no problem)

3.If you add a CIFS-share: won't it impact the performance of the vm's? Or is this neglectable?

4.Does performance of ZFS get better after a while (when cache/logs are built) ...?

5.How many vm's do you have running on a ZFS NAS? I would like to run all my vm's but wonder if it could take it (will cache be more heavily used so it CAN take it or is it just the logic = less = the better performance)?
vm's I would like to run: windows 7 workstation, sql 2008, windows sccm, windows scom, vcenter 5, 2 domain controllers, 2 xenapp-servers, maybe also a windows 2012 and windows 8 as testdrive
=> therefore question 4, I had the impression performance got better after a while, just want to know if I'm over-exhausting zfs running all these vm's  (then I would run some on local ssd's in the esx-server) or I would not take advantage of what it's capable of

6.One more thing: what to do with 3 nic's in ZFS, use them all, only use two of them & how to configure then?

Please advise.
J.
VMware

Avatar of undefined
Last Comment
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert PRO / EE Fellow/British Beekeeper)

8/22/2022 - Mon
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert PRO / EE Fellow/British Beekeeper)

THIS SOLUTION ONLY AVAILABLE TO MEMBERS.
View this solution by signing up for a free trial.
Members can start a 7-Day free trial and enjoy unlimited access to the platform.
See Pricing Options
Start Free Trial
GET A PERSONALIZED SOLUTION
Ask your own question & get feedback from real experts
Find out why thousands trust the EE community with their toughest problems.
janhoedt

ASKER
1.ISCSI for "some" workloads, you wouldn't recommand it by default (for performance reasons, just as you would use vmxnet3, not e1000 as nic in vmware machines)?

2.great tutorial thanks!

3.ok, I might consider bringing all my data of my Synology over to ZFS

4. & 5. ?! wow, so performance is only impacted by lack of diskpace, not the amount of vm's?
40 or 50 vm's on 1 ZFS?

6.ok, might not be good option to add extra nic, however if I would add my data to it and backup over network + migrate vm's once and a while to other nas (synology), it might be still good option to add more nics, right?
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert PRO / EE Fellow/British Beekeeper)

1. again wether you use iSCSI or NFS, it's up to you, Test, see which is better for you. It's not a ZFS SAN question, it's the age old question of NFS versus iSCSI.

2. no problems.

3. we use CIFs.

4 & 5. Yes, performs well for us on NFS.

6. Two NICs is always better than one. But in our tests, we've not been able to saturate a single 1GBe NIC, because of the performance on the server (cpu)
I started with Experts Exchange in 2004 and it's been a mainstay of my professional computing life since. It helped me launch a career as a programmer / Oracle data analyst
William Peck