Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of ServTech
ServTech

asked on

Which Server..?

Hi, We are about to dump (not literately) our old Dell server, the question I have is what Server would you recommend instead..?

It needs to be a bare bones tower, I don't want Dell again, had enough of them so am thinking about HP unless others can convince otherwise..?

It is for an office of up to 25 people, it needs to come with Windows Server 2012 not SBS preferably but it does need to come with the software bundled... It will be running the usual suspects, Exchange etc...

Any thoughts (and why)..?
Avatar of Amit
Amit
Flag of India image

I will go with HP. I worked on all branded servers in last 10 years and i found HP much stable and less issue.
Server brand is a matter of personal preference and past experiences. My clients run both Dell and HP servers and I have never had problems with either. I do recommend HP when I get the opportunity.
I also prefer HP.  You didn't provide any kind of budget so suggesting a specific server will be next to impossible.

I would take my budget and use as much of it up as I can.
Avatar of Member_2_231077
Member_2_231077

Why do you need Windows bundled in? You can buy it from HP but I don't think there's a pre-installed offering like Dell do (at least that means the OS won't be on a tiny partition if you install it yourself).
ScottCha referenced budget. I second that we would really need to know what numbers you have in mind.  The manufacturer is not as relevant as the configuration.  You mentioned Exchange, etc.  The "etc" part is really important.

If you're going to do Exchange and MS SQL Server for instance, I would not put those on the same server.  This doesn't mean you can't run both apps from the same physical machine but in order not to hose Exchange and SQL Server, put them on two Virtual Machines on the same box.  VMware ESXi is essentially free and can run two or three virtual servers for an office or 30 or less.

The HP ProLiant ML350e is a nice model.  Add 16GB of RAM and 2TB of disk for about $2000.  VMware will run two VMs on this configuration for an office your size, no problem.

You're smart by not going the SBS route - lots of trouble there.
SOLUTION
Avatar of Lee W, MVP
Lee W, MVP
Flag of United States of America image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of ServTech

ASKER

Hi Guys,

Sorry a budget of course, they are looking at around the 2k mark and would like win 2012 server thrown in, hence the reason for it being mentioned..? I didn't mean pre-installed just bundled...

The server runs exchange and serves files, no SQL (at the moment)

No requirement to be able to run VM's at the moment but you never know...

I have always liked HP kit and we've had serious problems with the Dell that we have at the moment, so no to Dell...

SBS - so many problems, never again.!

If we say we will go with HP, which models would be the best value for money and suit our requirements the best, apart from the HP ProLiant ML350e..? Any others...

Basically I need to go the boss and say right this is the HP server we require, this is the cost...
SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Oh, and Hyper-V Replica... IT'S FREE beyond your time learning it!
I do agree with leew on the MS Hyper-V.  I'm a VMware guy and always forget about Hyper-V.  Hyper-V is rock solid in Server 2012.  Virtualization is the way to go for a whole multitude of reasons not to mention disaster recovery.  It will not add cost to the system and will give you a lot of flexibility for growth.

Leew - sorry brother, I have to stick to my guns on no SBS.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
I have played with Hyper-V server and it is impressive indeed, I just haven't actually set it up as a Server 'for real'...  I can definitely see the benefit of VM's in the case of disaster recovery... I'll look into implementing that as well.

Thanks again for all the advice guys, I think I'll do more homework down the HP Server route and see where we get..!

Cheers