• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 820
  • Last Modified:

SAN VMWARE 15K DELL

Hi,

Happy New Year to you.  Looking for a SAN that would work well with Dell Servers in an vmware environment.

Dell SANS apparently do support 15K SAS disks, with a trade off of available disk space.  We were looking at a Dell SAN and the biggest disk we could get was 300 GB @ 15K, which wouldn't give us the storage we need.

600 GB disks are 10K SAS.

Thanks for the help in advance
0
cmatchett
Asked:
cmatchett
  • 5
  • 5
  • 4
  • +1
3 Solutions
 
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2)VMware and Virtualization ConsultantCommented:
Dell Equallogic PS4100
http://www.dell.com/us/enterprise/p/equallogic-ps4100-series

How much storage do you want, we have approx 14TB (raw), 24 x 600 disks!
0
 
Neil RussellTechnical Development LeadCommented:
Using an Equallogic SAN with 10K SAS disks will give you NO problems with vmware at all.


You can of course go to the PS series and tiered storage, if your budget fits. It is NOT always JUST about disk spin speeds.
0
 
Neil RussellTechnical Development LeadCommented:
All on Dell Equallogic Storage.
All of the above is on Equallogic tiered storage.
0
Free Tool: Site Down Detector

Helpful to verify reports of your own downtime, or to double check a downed website you are trying to access.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

 
cmatchettAuthor Commented:
Sorry, I should have put on the first post that this company run a database and the company who develop it, say they will only support it when it is running15k disks.  We have our dell san with 600 gb disks (12tb) with a RAID 10.  These are 10k

Dell only do disks with 15k @ 300 GB.  That would reduce our storage by 50%.

we have thought about getting a second chasis with 300gb disks dedicated for SQL...
0
 
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2)VMware and Virtualization ConsultantCommented:
how many IOPS does your database require?

ask your developers this question.
0
 
cmatchettAuthor Commented:
Hey Hancock, they said under no circumstances would they ever support the database on anything less than 15k disks.  Period.

I suppose they are just protecting themselves that way.  

Do you reckon that you could still get the required performance on 10k disks? if they met the IOP requirements?
0
 
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2)VMware and Virtualization ConsultantCommented:
databases are all about IOPS not the technology underneath, virtualising the database reduces the IOPS because the I/O is virtualised.

increasing the disks in the stripe, will increase the IOPS.
0
 
Neil RussellTechnical Development LeadCommented:
Sounds verymuch like your supplier knows very little about virtualization!

As hanccocka said and I said earlier, its not about spin speed, its all about IOPS.
0
 
cmatchettAuthor Commented:
I will come back with this information. thanks
0
 
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2)VMware and Virtualization ConsultantCommented:
We have weekly meetings with Clients and their Vendors, because they state, we will only support the software, database, application, if it's Dell, HP, IBM, has this technology or that technology.

and what we find, is that because they have only ever tested their tiny little application, on their test bed, they will not deviate from their baseline.

we even had one vendor this week, through the same argument, that their application needed 15k disks only.

When we gave them a solution to trial, that would give their application, at ~200,000 IOPS and >800MB/s, they told us it was slow!

We asked them to try the same tests on their test bed at their offices, and they could only yield 603 IOPS!

and if you are wondering what yeilds so high IOPS, SSDs, is your vendor going to say no to SSDs, because they want 15k rotational old hard drives!?
0
 
Neil RussellTechnical Development LeadCommented:
We have the PS6100XVS  with a mix of SAS and SSD disks and under testing we got a consistant 45000 IOPS under load.
0
 
cmatchettAuthor Commented:
Is there a IOP calculator that use would recommend when i have the information
0
 
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2)VMware and Virtualization ConsultantCommented:
Some very rough quick calculations

Total IOPS = (DriveIOPS * #Drives) / (ReadRatio + (RAIDWritePenalty * WriteRatio))

RAID 10 6 x 7,200 RPM SATA drive - Approx 50 IOPS each disk. assuming 33% Writes

Total IOPS = (50 IOPS x 6 disks)/(.67 + 2*.33))
           = 225 IOPS

RAID 5 6 x 600 SAS 15k Drives - Approx 200 IOPS each disk. assuming 33% writes

Total IOPS = (200 IOPS x 6 disks)/(0.67+4*.33))
           = 603 IOPS

Difference = 378 IOPS

We already know some numbers about IOPS per disk (assuming a reasonable latency and random access)

 

SAS (15K RPM)        - 175 IOPS

SATA (7.2K RPM)     -  75  IOPS

 

But how to double check if these numbers are ok or not?

 

Formula:

IOPS Estimated = 1 / ((seek time / 1000) + (latency / 1000)

 
Let's make a simple test:

 SAS - 600GB 15K - Seagate - http://www.seagate.com/www/en-us/products/enterprise-hard-drives/cheetah-15k#tTabContentSpecifications

 Estimated IOPS = 1 / ( ( (average read seek time+average write seek time) / 2) / 1000) + (average latency / 1000)

 Estimated IOPS = 1 / ((3.65 / 1000) + (2.0 / 1000) = 1 / (0.00365) + (0.002) = 176.99115044247787610619469026549 - ~ 175 IOPS

 SATA - 1TB 7.2K - Seagate - http://www.seagate.com/www/en-us/products/enterprise-hard-drives/constellation-es/constellation-es-1/#tTabContentSpecifications

 Estimated IOPS = 1 / ( ( (average read seek time+average write seek time) / 2) / 1000) + (average latency / 1000)

 Estimated IOPS = 1 / ((9.00 / 1000) + (4.16 / 1000) = 1 / (0.009) + (0.00416) = 75.987841945288753799392097264438 - ~ 75 IOPS

 Based on the calculation, those numbers above are OK

 
http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/datacenter/calculate-iops-in-a-storage-array/2182

http://www.wmarow.com/strcalc/
0
 
millardjkCommented:
To stay in your Dell-only environment, you could also look into using NexentaStor on Dell-branded gear. See http://www.nexenta.com/corp/solutions/dell-and-nexenta-storage-solutions for some example architecture; you can substitute 15k drives if the vendor is going to be absolutist about the solution, adding additional drive trays to get to your desired capacity.

However, the other Experts that have pointed out that its all about IOPS (and thruput) are right; that's why Dell offers the PS4500 series in the first place: pair 2 SATA drives (in a proper array) get the same performance as a single 10K disk. You pay for more in space/power/cooling to go SATA, but you can also get higher capacity per-disk: 2x2TB (raw) vs 600GB. A PS4500 with 2TB drives yields 96TB raw capacity (before establishing RAID levels) and will pool-up under RAID10 for 46TB--and the performance is equivalent to the PS4100XV, all in 3U of space instead of 2U.
0
 
cmatchettAuthor Commented:
still waiting on answer for this
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: IP Lookup

Get more info about an IP address or domain name, such as organization, abuse contacts and geolocation.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

  • 5
  • 5
  • 4
  • +1
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now