Still celebrating National IT Professionals Day with 3 months of free Premium Membership. Use Code ITDAY17


C++, copy constructor

Posted on 2013-01-17
Medium Priority
Last Modified: 2013-01-18
Hello experts, please have a look at the following code:

#include <iostream>

using namespace std;

class Line
      int getLength( void );
      Line( int len );             // simple constructor, headers only
      Line( const Line &obj);      // copy constructor, headers only
      ~Line();                      // destructor

      int *ptr;

Line::Line(int len)
    cout << "Normal constructor allocating ptr" << endl;
    // allocate memory for the pointer;
    ptr = new int;
    *ptr = len;

Line::Line(const Line &obj)
    cout << "Copy constructor allocating ptr." << endl;
    ptr = new int;
   *ptr = *obj.ptr; // copy the value

    cout << "Freeing memory!" << endl;
    delete ptr;
int Line::getLength( void )
    return *ptr;

void display(Line obj)
   cout << "Length of line : " << obj.getLength() <<endl;

// Main function for the program
int main( )
   Line line(10);

   display(line);//****** why does it call copy constructor here? ******

   return 0;

I do not understand why calling 'display' with 'line' as argument makes a call to constructor here...

Any help?

Thank you

Question by:panJames
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
LVL 22

Accepted Solution

ambience earned 1500 total points
ID: 38788153

void display(Line obj)

does not take Line by reference. It takes it by value so a copy happens
LVL 22

Expert Comment

ID: 38788160
void display(Line& obj)

should not invoke the constructor.

Looking at the purpose of display its better to have it like

void display(const Line& obj)

but that wont compile unless you also change

int getLength( void ) const;

int Line::getLength( void ) const
    return *ptr;
LVL 22

Expert Comment

ID: 38788176
As a general rule, always consider passing objects as const references unless there is a compelling reason not to do so. Passing it by reference ensures there is no overhead of copying and const ensure there are no side-affects because you can only access const methods and data on the object.

Featured Post

Concerto's Cloud Advisory Services

Want to avoid the missteps to gaining all the benefits of the cloud? Learn more about the different assessment options from our Cloud Advisory team.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Templates For Beginners Or How To Encourage The Compiler To Work For You Introduction This tutorial is targeted at the reader who is, perhaps, familiar with the basics of C++ but would prefer a little slower introduction to the more ad…
Written by John Humphreys C++ Threading and the POSIX Library This article will cover the basic information that you need to know in order to make use of the POSIX threading library available for C and C++ on UNIX and most Linux systems.   [s…
The goal of the video will be to teach the user the difference and consequence of passing data by value vs passing data by reference in C++. An example of passing data by value as well as an example of passing data by reference will be be given. Bot…
The viewer will be introduced to the member functions push_back and pop_back of the vector class. The video will teach the difference between the two as well as how to use each one along with its functionality.

722 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question