Solved

C++, copy constructor

Posted on 2013-01-17
3
445 Views
Last Modified: 2013-01-18
Hello experts, please have a look at the following code:


#include <iostream>

using namespace std;

class Line
{
   public:
      int getLength( void );
      Line( int len );             // simple constructor, headers only
      Line( const Line &obj);      // copy constructor, headers only
      ~Line();                      // destructor

   private:
      int *ptr;
};

Line::Line(int len)
{
    cout << "Normal constructor allocating ptr" << endl;
    // allocate memory for the pointer;
    ptr = new int;
    *ptr = len;
}

Line::Line(const Line &obj)
{
    cout << "Copy constructor allocating ptr." << endl;
    ptr = new int;
   *ptr = *obj.ptr; // copy the value
}

Line::~Line(void)
{
    cout << "Freeing memory!" << endl;
    delete ptr;
}
int Line::getLength( void )
{
    return *ptr;
}

void display(Line obj)
{
   cout << "Length of line : " << obj.getLength() <<endl;
}

// Main function for the program
int main( )
{
   Line line(10);

   display(line);//****** why does it call copy constructor here? ******

   return 0;
}

I do not understand why calling 'display' with 'line' as argument makes a call to constructor here...

Any help?

Thank you

panJames
0
Comment
Question by:panJames
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
3 Comments
 
LVL 22

Accepted Solution

by:
ambience earned 500 total points
ID: 38788153
because

void display(Line obj)

does not take Line by reference. It takes it by value so a copy happens
0
 
LVL 22

Expert Comment

by:ambience
ID: 38788160
void display(Line& obj)

should not invoke the constructor.

Looking at the purpose of display its better to have it like

void display(const Line& obj)

but that wont compile unless you also change

int getLength( void ) const;

int Line::getLength( void ) const
{
    return *ptr;
}
0
 
LVL 22

Expert Comment

by:ambience
ID: 38788176
As a general rule, always consider passing objects as const references unless there is a compelling reason not to do so. Passing it by reference ensures there is no overhead of copying and const ensure there are no side-affects because you can only access const methods and data on the object.
0

Featured Post

Ready to get started with anonymous questions?

It's easy! Check out this step-by-step guide for asking an anonymous question on Experts Exchange.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Often, when implementing a feature, you won't know how certain events should be handled at the point where they occur and you'd rather defer to the user of your function or class. For example, a XML parser will extract a tag from the source code, wh…
C++ Properties One feature missing from standard C++ that you will find in many other Object Oriented Programming languages is something called a Property (http://www.experts-exchange.com/Programming/Languages/CPP/A_3912-Object-Properties-in-C.ht…
The goal of the tutorial is to teach the user how to use functions in C++. The video will cover how to define functions, how to call functions and how to create functions prototypes. Microsoft Visual C++ 2010 Express will be used as a text editor an…
The viewer will be introduced to the member functions push_back and pop_back of the vector class. The video will teach the difference between the two as well as how to use each one along with its functionality.
Suggested Courses

623 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question