Cisco switch not acting right

On a new install of a WS-C2960S-48TS-L.  The switch has 4 SFP ports.  I have other Cisco switches with the same SFP port module this one has and am fimiliar with them.  The documentation claims I am using the correct SFP module.  

I installed a new GLC-SX-MM module in one of the ports and connected it to a SFP port on my WS-C2960G-24TC-L.  Here is what happens:

C2960S (new) - Gi1/0/50 1000 BaseSX SFP Status: Port is disabled.

C2960G  (existing) - Gi0/23 1000 Base SX SFP Status: Link up  Speed 1000 mbps  Duplex Full.

I can't find any way to get it to work.  I have disabled and enabled the port without luck. I have used different SFP modules in different ports.  Same result.

Is the switch defective?
Who is Participating?

[Webinar] Streamline your web hosting managementRegister Today

Don JohnstonConnect With a Mentor InstructorCommented:
How do I unblock it?
You could unplug the G1/0/1 port. It's blocking G1/0/50 because there's another path to the root.  Spanning-tree has determined that the best path to the root is out the G1/0/1 port.
It sounds remarkably like the port is blocking.
Do a sh spanning-tree blockedports while the interface in question is connected.
Do a sh spanning-tree gi1/0/50 as well.
skkinneyAuthor Commented:
CS-G-830-1>sh spanning-tree

  Spanning tree enabled protocol ieee
  Root ID    Priority    32768
             Address     0009.5bb3.c8c9
             Cost        20004
             Port        1 (GigabitEthernet1/0/1)
             Hello Time   2 sec  Max Age 20 sec  Forward Delay 15 sec

  Bridge ID  Priority    32769  (priority 32768 sys-id-ext 1)
             Address     5897.1ea7.5000
             Hello Time   2 sec  Max Age 20 sec  Forward Delay 15 sec
             Aging Time  300 sec

Interface           Role Sts Cost      Prio.Nbr Type
------------------- ---- --- --------- -------- --------------------------
Gi1/0/1             Root FWD 4         128.1    P2p
Gi1/0/8             Desg FWD 4         128.8    P2p
Gi1/0/14            Desg FWD 4         128.14   P2p
Gi1/0/30            Desg FWD 4         128.30   P2p
Gi1/0/33            Desg FWD 4         128.33   P2p
Gi1/0/34            Desg FWD 4         128.34   P2p
Gi1/0/35            Desg FWD 4         128.35   P2p
Gi1/0/47            Desg FWD 4         128.47   P2p
Gi1/0/48            Desg FWD 4         128.48   P2p
Gi1/0/50            Altn BLK 4         128.50   P2p
Will You Be GDPR Compliant by 5/28/2018?

GDPR? That's a regulation for the European Union. But, if you collect data from customers or employees within the EU, then you need to know about GDPR and make sure your organization is compliant by May 2018. Check out our preparation checklist to make sure you're on track today!

It's blocking - BLK tells us that.
Before you unblock it, find out why it's doing this - and by that I mean find out what loop you're being protected from by spanning-tree.
If you want redundant links, etc. I would suggest configuring the links as Etherchannel.
skkinneyAuthor Commented:
So you are saying it is protecting itself, probably from loopback?  I have no other direct connections to the other switch.  There is a third switch involved that provides an indirect link.  Could this be the problem?

How do I unblock it?
skkinneyAuthor Commented:
OK, so that confirms the third switch is the problem.  Thanks for your help.
You're welco-oh wait, you weren't thanking me....guess I gave you zero info that helped. Good times!
Don JohnstonInstructorCommented:
Yeah... These points should go to rharland2009.
skkinneyAuthor Commented:
Oh, I am so sorry.  I wasn't paying attention.  How do we get the points to the correct person?
Don't sweat it...I was just being snarky. Glad you got your gear rockin.
All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.