Richard_Steiner
asked on
server 2008 DHCP
Hi guys,
I have a windows server 2008 r2 as dhcp server ..
My DHCP server (and all other servers) are on a 172.21.0.0 network ..
My clients are on a different network which is 172.21.1.0 network ..
Now, my question is, how do I configure my DHCP so that clients can reach it and also reach resources on the 172.21.0.0 network.
Presently, clients cannot reach the DHCP server
Hoping to get some help here ..as usual
~Richard
I have a windows server 2008 r2 as dhcp server ..
My DHCP server (and all other servers) are on a 172.21.0.0 network ..
My clients are on a different network which is 172.21.1.0 network ..
Now, my question is, how do I configure my DHCP so that clients can reach it and also reach resources on the 172.21.0.0 network.
Presently, clients cannot reach the DHCP server
Hoping to get some help here ..as usual
~Richard
It depends on the subnet mask configured on the dhcp and clients...
You need to configure them on the same subnet ( for your case; 172.21.0.0 /16)
You need to configure them on the same subnet ( for your case; 172.21.0.0 /16)
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
ASKER
Hi D0ughb0y,
How should I configure the additional NIC on the DHCP server. Note that the sever already has an IP on the 172.21.0.0 network and it is also a domain controller
How should I configure the additional NIC on the DHCP server. Note that the sever already has an IP on the 172.21.0.0 network and it is also a domain controller
You give it a static address on that 1.0 network, and just connect it directly to the 1.0 network. (Sorry I said 21.0 before. My bad.) That's it.
Then create the scope on the DHCP server, and let it go.
Then create the scope on the DHCP server, and let it go.
ASKER
Thanx mate ..
I am presently not at the said site ..I will revert and let u know how it goes soon as I visit the site.
Regards,
~Richard
I am presently not at the said site ..I will revert and let u know how it goes soon as I visit the site.
Regards,
~Richard
ASKER
I've requested that this question be deleted for the following reason:
Did not get a solution
Did not get a solution
You can do what you like, but I think the way that you've handled this is, frankly, poor. You asked a question. You got responses. The last response we got from you was, "I'm not there now. I'll try it next time." That's it. You never responded again. You never said, "I tried that - it didn't work," or "I got such-and-such error message," or even "They don't have the equipment to support what you suggested, and aren't interested in getting it." Nothing. You didn't NOT get help. And you didn't much help us help you. That's how this works, Richard.
ASKER
Oh my goodness ..I am so sorry I did not get back to you on this. I actually tried what you suggested and it did not work and since they did not have the type of equipment required (how did u guess) I resorted to configuring dhcp on the router. Its a new environment so I had the flexibility of doing that with ease. its all fine now tho.
My sincere apologies ..u guys have been of much help here on experts-exchange and I did not mean to be an ass (silly me)
Regards,
~Richard
My sincere apologies ..u guys have been of much help here on experts-exchange and I did not mean to be an ass (silly me)
Regards,
~Richard
ASKER
I actually decided to use the network router as DHCPs server since my clients could not the requirements to implement the above solution.
~Richard
~Richard
No problem, Richard. My guess is that you had the devices on the second network connected to the same switch as those on the first? In that case, they're not really on the second network, which is why the second DHCP domain wouldn't have worked. If they were truly on a second network, entirely, they should have been able to pick up DHCP from the second interface,
Anyway, glad you've got it working in some capacity. Sorry for being heavy-handed.
Anyway, glad you've got it working in some capacity. Sorry for being heavy-handed.
ASKER
Yea, you are right ..they were both connected to the same switch. I was able to identify that after I implemented the solution I mentioned above. But since the clients are fine now I will allow it stay like that till there is need for a review. I think I may need to also improve my networking skills.
Thanks all the same, some times people like me need a push like that ..lol
~Richard
Thanks all the same, some times people like me need a push like that ..lol
~Richard
However a more elaborate solution would be a relay agent:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc771390.aspx