Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of VirtualKansas
VirtualKansas

asked on

Access tables export as a routine to a sql instance sharepoint 2010 will then use as a source

Ridiculous to be sure; but a production environment using a split access database cannot be disrupted; so building scaffolding around the production access tables for reports, etc.

If proof of concept materializes, then SharePoint could well take over as it was intended; where sql on SP will be the back end, access front end can continue to do the job as it has in the past and SP can start doing the things it does to serve information based on common (access front end and sp) sql data.

Now question; is it possible to routinely export access data to a sql instance that sharepoint can use for external content?  Keeps the access tables db alive and alone in production, whilst sharepoint dev/test can continue using somewhat live data.  I see no way for sp to connect directly to access db tables, which would be best outcome.  Have successfully exported access tables to sp using access and all looks fine.  But given data is a one time load from access to sp; how to keep the sp data up to date, at least once/day?

As I said "ridiculous" to be sure, but best idea I've had to get out of the rut and allow sp dev lab to progress, while access live db stays untouched in production.
SOLUTION
Avatar of Chris B
Chris B
Flag of Australia image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of Mark Wills
Mark Wills
Flag of Australia image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of VirtualKansas
VirtualKansas

ASKER

Good morning EE's and thank you for replies...  I'm  little thick headed this early on a Sunday, but thank you for the plans.  Will follow through, shortly.  Thanks & regards...
I have to be honest and close this one out with my thanks.  There has been a temporary redirection of efforts and I won't be able to get back to this thread in a timely manner; so will close and split points as haven't been able to use either excellent ideas.  Apologies if even split is lop sided; clearly both answer are on point.  Thank you, talk to you soon...
No problems, but if you do get a chance and post another question, would be good to see the link here too :).

Cheers, and hope to see you again soon.

Mark Wills