Solved

No binding for SSL on default web site

Posted on 2013-01-22
3
1,488 Views
Last Modified: 2016-10-11
When running Windows best practice analyser it keeps reporting  “No binding for SSL on default Web Site”. I have checked the bindings and tried to add a new https binding as per the instructions on best practice analyser. However, it tells me that the “specified port is being used by a different binding” although I have tried selecting each certificate.
0
Comment
Question by:paulmac110
3 Comments
 
LVL 5

Accepted Solution

by:
Harsem earned 500 total points
ID: 38804614
Hello,

it sounds like you already have another site that uses the Port that you are trying to use for that site. If this is SSL then most likely you are trying to use Port 443.

Can you confirm if this web server is already hosting another site, and if this is already using that port. You cannot have 2 sites sharing the same port.

If you need to create a second site with the SSL certificate you only have 2 options:
- create the binding on another port (such as 9443 or 444)
   This tends not to be doine as this is a non-standard port and most firewalls will block this communication.
- Give this server a second IP address (it can be on the same subnet with the same default gateway) and bind the site to this new IP address on port 443.

Please note however that with option 2 above you need to change your site binding away from the default "*" in the Ip address to the actual IP address of an interface.

If you continue to struggle with this can I ask for print-screens of the IIS config on that server.

Hope this helps

Jens
0
 
LVL 14

Expert Comment

by:BlueCompute
ID: 38804914
Is this an SBS server?  If so the https 443 binding is on the SBS Web Applications site rather than the default website.
0
 
LVL 1

Expert Comment

by:benkeyser
ID: 41838134
If I can reopen this question - I have a 4 box-standard SBS 2011 installations. All giving this error/issue. I checked all the sites and ONLY the default sites use 443. Also, the bindings on all the sites are the same, and as I mentioned these are out of the box installations. So, any ideas why the analyser keeps on kicking out this response?

The discussions above does not really seem to present a solution (in my case anyway)

Ben
0

Featured Post

Simplifying Server Workload Migrations

This use case outlines the migration challenges that organizations face and how the Acronis AnyData Engine supports physical-to-physical (P2P), physical-to-virtual (P2V), virtual to physical (V2P), and cross-virtual (V2V) migration scenarios to address these challenges.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
CFFILE upload help 98 169
Stream live video from Raspberry Pi camera 22 188
TCP Error code:Unable to connect to a banking site 4 52
Windows Restrict installation 11 38
Meet the world's only “Transparent Cloud™” from Superb Internet Corporation. Now, you can experience firsthand a cloud platform that consistently outperforms Amazon Web Services (AWS), IBM’s Softlayer, and Microsoft’s Azure when it comes to CPU and …
There's a better way to communicate time sensitive or critical info.
Nobody understands Phishing better than an anti-spam company. That’s why we are providing Phishing Awareness Training to our customers. According to a report by Verizon, only 3% of targeted users report malicious emails to management. With compan…
I've attached the XLSM Excel spreadsheet I used in the video and also text files containing the macros used.

791 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question