?
Solved

Benefit of STUFF verseus coalesce

Posted on 2013-01-30
3
Medium Priority
?
1,963 Views
Last Modified: 2013-01-31
I saw an article a while back comparing the speed of STUFF versus coalesce.

Can someone give me a quick reason why its actually supposed to be better?

Select *,STUFF(( SELECT ' ' + CC.[First Name] + ' ' + CC.[Last Name] + '-' + B.Notes   + CHAR(10)                    

                  FROM  dbo.[Client Contact Events] AS B

                  INNER JOIN dbo.[Client Contacts] CC

                  ON B.[Contact ID] = CC.[Contact ID]

                  WHERE [CVT].[Client ID] = B.[Client ID]

                        AND   B.EventType = 'Visit'

                        AND   B.[Contact Date] > [CVT].createdDate  FOR XML PATH ('')),1,0,'') AS [Contact Notes]
From mytable

Open in new window

0
Comment
Question by:lrbrister
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
3 Comments
 
LVL 18

Accepted Solution

by:
deighton earned 1000 total points
ID: 38835928
https://msmvps.com/blogs/robfarley/archive/2007/04/08/coalesce-is-not-the-answer-to-string-concatentation-in-t-sql.aspx

I don't know about speed, but here is an article talking about the creation of a concatenated
string using FOR XML PATH rather than

DECLARE @X varchar(200);
SELECT @X = COALESCE(@X , '') + YourField FROM YourTable;
SELECT @X;



which can go wrong if you introduce for example

DECLARE @X varchar(200);
SELECT @X = COALESCE(@X , '') + YourField FROM YourTable ORDER BY LEN(YourField);
SELECT @X;

-----

however STUFF and COALESCE seem to be asides here, they are only being used to tidy things up.  It is really an argument between the 'SELECT @VARIABLE = ..'  method and 'FOR XML PATH'

personally I think 'FOR XML PATH' has problems
0
 
LVL 69

Assisted Solution

by:Scott Pletcher
Scott Pletcher earned 1000 total points
ID: 38835958
STUFF and COALESCE do two different things, so you can't really make a direct comparison between them.

I use only FOR XML PATH, since there are documented issues with "SELECT @variable =", particularly with parallelism, and MS has explicitly stated that it's not supported.
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:lrbrister
ID: 38839681
Thanks guys.
0

Featured Post

VIDEO: THE CONCERTO CLOUD FOR HEALTHCARE

Modern healthcare requires a modern cloud. View this brief video to understand how the Concerto Cloud for Healthcare can help your organization.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

JSON is being used more and more, besides XML, and you surely wanted to parse the data out into SQL instead of doing it in some Javascript. The below function in SQL Server can do the job for you, returning a quick table with the parsed data.
Recently we ran in to an issue while running some SQL jobs where we were trying to process the cubes.  We got an error saying failure stating 'NT SERVICE\SQLSERVERAGENT does not have access to Analysis Services. So this is a way to automate that wit…
Via a live example, show how to set up a backup for SQL Server using a Maintenance Plan and how to schedule the job into SQL Server Agent.
Via a live example, show how to shrink a transaction log file down to a reasonable size.
Suggested Courses

752 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question