Solved

Network Design Multiple Locations

Posted on 2013-01-30
5
243 Views
Last Modified: 2013-01-31
I need some advice and guidance to a network design.

Scenario:

2 Locations connected by a point to point T-1 (Slow) Each location has a domain controller.

question one: Does the satelite location need a domain controller?
question two: Will a site to site VPN on a 3MB fiber connection be better? What about security?

I have looked into MPLS but it is spendy and its still 1.5 for a reasonable cost.

Thanks
0
Comment
Question by:Keef4000
  • 3
  • 2
5 Comments
 
LVL 20

Expert Comment

by:agonza07
ID: 38836777
What are you looking to do? Spend less?

You dont need a domain controller at the remote site as long as its fairly small. I have no DC at several sites with 30 or less users, but I do for sites that have more than that.

The VPN question depends on what you are running between the offices. If its just file sharing, then it might work fine, but if you are runnin VoIP or email or other windows services then you may end up with dropped packets and slow connections.

VPN can be very secure depending on how you configure it.

I would recommend you try the VPN set up, but just pilot it while leaving the T1 in place so you can revert back in case people start complaining.
0
 

Author Comment

by:Keef4000
ID: 38837634
My goal isnt to spend less it is to get a faster more robust connection from our main office to our secondary office. I already have a DC over there so its not a problem to leave it I just thought I didnt need it is all.

I'll be running a 4MB fiber connection to the cloud instead of the 1.5MB T-1 point to point. Phones do go over the cloud however which is my main concern. Our email is hosted so either way that goes over the cloud.

We do have some custome SQL software that gets sent to our main office from our satelite office. They also do some file sharing between the sites as well.
0
 
LVL 20

Expert Comment

by:agonza07
ID: 38837698
0
 

Author Comment

by:Keef4000
ID: 38839785
Yes I was actually looking to get one of the Meraki devices. They look pretty nice.

So would you switch service providers to do a fiber connection to the cloud vs. the t-1 point to point?
0
 
LVL 20

Accepted Solution

by:
agonza07 earned 500 total points
ID: 38839798
For just one remote office, I would. Looks like you have almost everything moved to the cloud already too, so there's very minimal need for a point to point circuit.
0

Featured Post

Now Available: Firebox Cloud for AWS and FireboxV

Firebox Cloud brings the protection of WatchGuard’s leading Firebox UTM appliances to public cloud environments. It enables organizations to extend their security perimeter to protect business-critical assets in Amazon Web Services (AWS).

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

This article is in response to a question (http://www.experts-exchange.com/Networking/Network_Management/Network_Analysis/Q_28230497.html) here at Experts Exchange. The Original Poster (OP) requires a utility that will accept a list of IP addresses …
Outsource Your Fax Infrastructure to the Cloud (And come out looking like an IT Hero!) Relative to the many demands on today’s IT teams, spending capital, time and resources to maintain physical fax servers and infrastructure is not a high priority.
Get a first impression of how PRTG looks and learn how it works.   This video is a short introduction to PRTG, as an initial overview or as a quick start for new PRTG users.
This video gives you a great overview about bandwidth monitoring with SNMP and WMI with our network monitoring solution PRTG Network Monitor (https://www.paessler.com/prtg). If you're looking for how to monitor bandwidth using netflow or packet s…

726 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question