Solved

NLB - unicast Vs multicast

Posted on 2013-01-30
3
735 Views
Last Modified: 2013-01-31
Hi - can someone please describe in lay-man's terms the difference between these two modes in network load balancing, it is so confusing what I've found online...

Thanks!
0
Comment
Question by:fredostare
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
3 Comments
 
LVL 57

Expert Comment

by:giltjr
ID: 38837738
Do you know and understand the difference between unicast and multicast as it relates to IP in general?
0
 

Author Comment

by:fredostare
ID: 38839164
HI giltjr, well, my limited understanding would be that unicast would be broadcasting to one specific host and multicast would be broadcasting to many... is that anywhere near?
0
 
LVL 57

Accepted Solution

by:
giltjr earned 500 total points
ID: 38839210
That is correct.  It's not really broadcasting, but it is sending traffic to more than one destination using a single MAC/IP address and a single frame/packet.

In NLB unicast you must have 2 NIC's.  One that will be used for the NLB traffic and one for the two servers to talk to each other.  This is because in unicast mode, both hosts will use the same IP address for NLB traffic.  

In NLB multicast mode you can get by with a single NIC, but it is not recommended generally.  This is because MS uses a multicast MAC address which can exist on multiple devices.  MS does break standards here because they use a multicast MAC address with a unicast IP address, which is not really valid to do.

Both modes have their advantages and disadvantages because of the way switches work.  In fact because different switches work different ways unicast may be better on some switches while multicast on others.

Read this and see if it helps:

http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=1006580
0

Featured Post

Report: Liquid Web beats Amazon, Rackspace & More

A study by performance analyst firm Cloud Spectator finds that Liquid Web beats rivals Amazon, Rackspace and DigitalOcean when it comes to website and cloud application performance.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Meet the world's only “Transparent Cloud™” from Superb Internet Corporation. Now, you can experience firsthand a cloud platform that consistently outperforms Amazon Web Services (AWS), IBM’s Softlayer, and Microsoft’s Azure when it comes to CPU and …
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem.   Tips on how to secure IoT devices, even the dumbest ones, so they can't be used as part of a DDoS botnet.  Use PRTG Network Monitor as one of the building blocks, to detect unusual…
Viewers will learn how to connect to a wireless network using the network security key. They will also learn how to access the IP address and DNS server for connections that must be done manually. After setting up a router, find the network security…
Here's a very brief overview of the methods PRTG Network Monitor (https://www.paessler.com/prtg) offers for monitoring bandwidth, to help you decide which methods you´d like to investigate in more detail.  The methods are covered in more detail in o…

738 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question