Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of nappyshock
nappyshock

asked on

Cisco 800 series VLAN interfaces

In have a branch site presently connected via SDSL utilising a  Cisco 888 router. This router has the fixed physical interfaces with a ATM0 interface and a bank of 4 fastethernet acting as a four port switch running VLAN1.
At present the ATM0 is the "Outside" running the SDSL and the FE0-3 is the "Inside" running a interface VLAN1. BGP is running on the SDSL interface.

The site is due to have it's external SDSL link replace by a 10Mb circuit which will be presented as a RJ45.

My question is to save the cost of a new router can anyone see any issues by not using a dedicated physical interface for the outside link but using the four port switch on the router for both the "Inside" and "Outside" links, with two VLAN interfaces configured ie interface VLAN2 as the "Outside" and interface VLAN1 as the "Inside". BGP would be required to run on the outside interface as before.

So the setup would be something like.....
Interface Fe0 in VLAN1 connected to the inside.
Interface Fe1 in VLAN2 connected to the outside also running BGP.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of bfason
bfason
Flag of United States of America image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of nappyshock
nappyshock

ASKER

Thanks bfason. There won't be security involved just the BGP, so i hope it would be up to it.

No one else set one up like this?
SOLUTION
Avatar of Sandeep Gupta
Sandeep Gupta
Flag of India image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
We have decided not to go down this route now  as it's a setup i've not tested in the field and it would be unwise to do this on a working customer.
Thanks for both of your comments.