Improve company productivity with a Business Account.Sign Up

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 9828
  • Last Modified:

Gi3/2 is not compatible with Po2 and will be suspended (vlan mask is different)

Getting above error while adding new VLAN in to trunk port in cisco catalyst 4507R core switches and port change suspented. I have port channel configured..
0
sumod_jacob
Asked:
sumod_jacob
  • 3
  • 2
2 Solutions
 
rauenpcCommented:
The error is stating the issue. Something about the vlan settings on port gig3/2 doesn't match the port-channel. This could be a native vlan mismatch or there could be different allowed vlans. Do a compare of the show run for each port and see if you can find the difference.

You could also post the running config of the port channel and all member ports including gig3/2 and the error when you try to add it to the port channel.
0
 
sumod_jacobAuthor Commented:
If i need to add new VLAN to the trunk port, do i need to add that VLAN to port channel first ot directly apply to the interface?
0
 
rauenpcCommented:
Depends on the device and IOS version. I've had some that all changes to the port channel interface propagated down to the member ports, and others where I had to do a range command on ALL ports to make the change simultaneously.

Range command
interface range gig3/1 - 4 , po2


As a matter of CYA, if you haven't done this before you may want to wait for an outage window or at least make people aware that a network blip could occur. It's always better safe then sorry when it comes to keeping the powers that be happy.
0
The 14th Annual Expert Award Winners

The results are in! Meet the top members of our 2017 Expert Awards. Congratulations to all who qualified!

 
sumod_jacobAuthor Commented:
Device is Cisco 4507R with iOS 12.2, this the second time I doing this tomorrow and need to go smoothly.
0
 
Craig BeckCommented:
Can you post the relevant interface and portchannel configs?
0
 
sumod_jacobAuthor Commented:
I have done it by changing port channel configuration, changes reflected by itself on interfaces belongs to.. No drop of connectivity.. So smooth.. Thanks for your help..
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Featured Post

Get your problem seen by more experts

Be seen. Boost your question’s priority for more expert views and faster solutions

  • 3
  • 2
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now