Tech or Treat! Write an article about your scariest tech disaster to win gadgets!Learn more

x
?
Solved

Storage Comparisons

Posted on 2013-05-12
3
Medium Priority
?
198 Views
Last Modified: 2016-11-23
Dear Expertise.
can I get help I want Storage Comparisons between dell compellent c8000 and Netapp storage .
0
Comment
Question by:human1900
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
3 Comments
 
LVL 42

Accepted Solution

by:
paulsolov earned 1000 total points
ID: 39160368
There's a lot of aspects that go into the decision.

What are you looking to do on the SAN?  Are you looking for block only (FC, FCOe, iSCSI) or NAS/SAN to run NFS/CIFS?

What is your long term strategy, in place upgrade or forklift?  Do you want automatic data tiering or dedicated SSD for high iops throughput?  

What will be installed in this environment?
0
 

Author Comment

by:human1900
ID: 39164876
dear paulsolov  - Thanks for your feedback.

we want to make Comparisons between dell compellent c8000 and Netapp storage ( what is good features in both of them .

for connectivity FC is prefer .
we are looking for reliable storage .
2- snabing & restoring  features for email and individual mailbox( exchange 2010 ) and Data.
3- speed of Taking snabing & restoring email ( exchange 2010 ) and Data.
5- userfrindly of using . ...... act
0
 
LVL 42

Expert Comment

by:paulsolov
ID: 39165646
Both vendors are reliable.

I haven't seen anything on the Compellent side that integrates directly with Exchange, perhaps they have something new out there that I'm not aware of.

On the Netapp side there is SnapManager for Exchange will allows you backup the Information Stores and restore them quickly

For granular mailbox backups there is an integrated product (SMBR) Single Mailbox Recovery which is essentially Ontrack PowerControls that works well in restoring mailboxes

With regards to user friendliness both are ok, I've had more experience with Netapp so I'm biased but the other piece of the environment is usually with a Netapp it's the same OS and if you get a 3000 model and higher there is no forklift upgrade, I believe with the Compellent it is rip and replace when upgrading to a new mode.
0

Featured Post

On Demand Webinar: Networking for the Cloud Era

Ready to improve network connectivity? Watch this webinar to learn how SD-WANs and a one-click instant connect tool can boost provisions, deployment, and management of your cloud connection.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

If you troubleshoot Outlook for clients, you may want to know a bit more about the OST file before doing your next job. IMAP can cause a lot of drama if removed in the accounts without backing up.
By default Outlook 2016 displays only one time zone in the Calendar. The following article explains how to display two time zones in one calendar view.
Get people started with the process of using Access VBA to control Outlook using automation, Microsoft Access can control other applications. An example is the ability to programmatically talk to Microsoft Outlook. Using automation, an Access applic…
There are cases when e.g. an IT administrator wants to have full access and view into selected mailboxes on Exchange server, directly from his own email account in Outlook or Outlook Web Access. This proves useful when for example administrator want…

647 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question