• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 550
  • Last Modified:

Socket question - "active open" vs "passive open"

I am new to sockets.  Trying to communicate with a peice of equipment whose documentation is not very good.  It is set up to use multiple socket connections (one for 'connectivity heartbeat', another for 'main control', another for 'image transmission', etc).  All but one of these is working fine.  For all these sockets, I do the following to configure a socket and make it do what I would call a "blocking listen":

    WSADATA wsaData;
    SOCKET s, S;
    SOCKADDR_IN addr, ADDR;
 
    WSAStartup(MAKEWORD(1, 1), &wsaData);

    s = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);

    addr.sin_family = AF_INET;
    addr.sin_port = htons(ThePort);
    addr.sin_addr.s_addr = htonl(INADDR_ANY);

    bind(s, (SOCKADDR *)&addr, sizeof(addr);
 
    listen(s, 1);

    S = accept(s, (SOCKADDR *)&ADDR, &len);

    int len = recv(S, lpszBuffer, 4096, 0);

It blocks at the "recv" call until something comes in.  Thats all fine.  But I can't get the one last socket to work (the "image transmission" socket).  Finally, I noticed that in the crappy documentation, it shows the other sockets (that I have working) as "passive open" for my side, but the one I'm having trouble with they show as "active open" from my side.  So, I'm not sure what is meant, but I'm guessing it means I should be the 'client' instead of the 'server' for this connection.   It is a connection on which I am to receive a bunch of data, and (apparently) I needn't send out anything -- so I thought that my normal sequence (code above) to open the socket and listen for data would be correct.  But, nothing ever comes, and it looks like I never get past the "accept" call.  

So.... is there a different way I should set up this socket?  Looking at some other socket code, it looks like I see the same preamble as in my code above, but in place of the "bind" call, just do a "connect" call at that point.  But, I don't really know what I'm doing, so I'm hoping a socket expert might have an idea for me!
0
tullhead
Asked:
tullhead
  • 2
1 Solution
 
mccarlIT Business Systems Analyst / Software DeveloperCommented:
Going just by what you have written above, I would say that you guess in probably on the mark. And so yes, you will want to "connect" the socket rather than bind & accept. The main difference is that instead of using the INADDR_ANY address, you will need to know the address of the piece of equipment. Now in most cases this should be easy, just get it from your ADDR struct (the one you passed to "accept()", it fills the struct with the address info of the remote end that is connecting to you). So you probably just need to change the port number within ADDR, to the port that you have to connect to for "image transmission". So something along the lines of (add this after the code you have above, and also add appropriate error checking, etc)...
SOCKET imageSocket = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
ADDR.sin_port = htons(ImagePort);
connect(imageSocket, (SOCKADDR *)&ADDR, len);

Open in new window

If the "connect()" call succeeds, you can now call "recv()" etc on the imageSocket to retrieve any data that the equipment pushes back to you.
0
 
tullheadAuthor Commented:
It works!!
0
 
mccarlIT Business Systems Analyst / Software DeveloperCommented:
It works!!
That's good, glad I could help! :)
0

Featured Post

Independent Software Vendors: We Want Your Opinion

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

  • 2
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now