Solved

Which Exchange to choose: 2010 or 2013

Posted on 2013-05-19
6
382 Views
Last Modified: 2013-05-20
Hi fellow Exchange Experts,

I'm planning a new Exchange server for a pretty small network, just 10 users who need just plain mail, tasks, contacts, appointments - no Sharepoint, Lync, or such. No need for WebAccess, just a handful of iPhones to connect. Otherwise Outlook 2013 will be used on the desktops. So all in all nothing spectacular.

I'm now wondering if I should offer an SBS 2011 with Exchange 2010, or an Exchange 2013 (they will have a spare Windows 2012 Server license for that). Price-wise it wouldn't make a big dent in the budget if I'd go with the more expensive Exchange 2013 - but will it technically be worth it? I've checked the feature comparison and haven't found anything that thrills me that much...

What do you think? Stick to the well-known and established Exchange 2010 (saving a few bucks) or go with the new Exchange 2013 for the sake of having the latest version?

Thanks for your 2 cents... (I will probably split the points, if more than one reasonable input is given)

Thomas
0
Comment
Question by:Staudte
6 Comments
 
LVL 10

Assisted Solution

by:ecarbone
ecarbone earned 200 total points
ID: 39179685
My opinion - if it were me and if this is a NEW exchange environment, I would go with exchange 2013 and server 2012, based on:

1. Microsoft discontinued small business server
2. Management of 2013 seems like it is easier than 2010 (less roles, web-based administration)

If you've researched 2013, you most likely came across this article, which states 2013 is not quite ready for prime time. That may be the case, but some issues (such as coexistence with 2010) have been resolved:

Exchange 2013 Article

Of course, another option is to go for Exchange 365 ... $48 per year per user. Full support for Outlook, webmail and smart phones.

My two cents.
0
 
LVL 52

Assisted Solution

by:Manpreet SIngh Khatra
Manpreet SIngh Khatra earned 100 total points
ID: 39180061
Preferably go for Hosting with Office365 if only 10 users if not then .... if not then its best to have Exchange 2010 as its Stable and support will surely remain for some time

If you have some specific query do let know

- Rancy
0
 

Author Comment

by:Staudte
ID: 39180072
Hi Ecarbone and Rancy,

thanks for the thoughts. Office365 is not an option - we won't hand company data to a 3rd party. Is 2013 really easier to administrate? (I mean in real life - it's natural that MS claims that it's easier, but they say the same for leaving out the Start menu in Win8...) I have gotten quite used to the MMC interface of 2010...

Tom
0
Problems using Powershell and Active Directory?

Managing Active Directory does not always have to be complicated.  If you are spending more time trying instead of doing, then it's time to look at something else. For nearly 20 years, AD admins around the world have used one tool for day-to-day AD management: Hyena. Discover why

 
LVL 52

Expert Comment

by:Manpreet SIngh Khatra
ID: 39180081
I would go with 2010 as i know that it is and support and life is easier whereas 2013 isnt that sure stable and has the Web console which i am not sure is how good as of now.

I would still bet on 2010 currently :)

- Rancy
0
 
LVL 63

Accepted Solution

by:
Simon Butler (Sembee) earned 200 total points
ID: 39180270
The major problem with 2013 is lack of third party support. Backup Exec for example still doesn't support 2013.
While SBS 2011 is approaching its end of life, you can still purchase it and it still fully supported. I have deployed two SBS 2011's in the last week, have another three scheduled over the next couple of months. If they are unlikely to go above the user limit then I would go with SBS 2011 - it is a rock solid product (if configured correctly using the wizards) and there is a lot of third party support, both applications and general assistance.

If you went with Exchange 2013, then you could still deploy 2010, using downgrade rights. You could then look at upgrading it later on once it is stable and third party support has improved.

Simon.
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:Staudte
ID: 39180320
Thank you folks - your thoughts were very valuable. Actually, the downgrade rights put the final weight on the 2013's side of the scale. I'll buy and install 2013 - if for whatever reason I'm unhappy, I'll scrap the thing and install 2010 at no extra cost. That way I have both options (and can always try 2013 again at a later time).
0

Featured Post

Announcing the Most Valuable Experts of 2016

MVEs are more concerned with the satisfaction of those they help than with the considerable points they can earn. They are the types of people you feel privileged to call colleagues. Join us in honoring this amazing group of Experts.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

MS Outlook is a world-class email client application that is mainly used for e-communication globally.  In this article, we will discuss the basic idea about MS Outlook, its advanced features, and types of MS Outlook File formats.
This article explains how to install and use the NTBackup utility that comes with Windows Server.
This video demonstrates how to sync Microsoft Exchange Public Folders with smartphones using CodeTwo Exchange Sync and Exchange ActiveSync. To learn more about CodeTwo Exchange Sync and download the free trial, go to: http://www.codetwo.com/excha…
This video shows how to quickly and easily add an email signature for all users on Exchange 2016. The resulting signature is applied on a server level by Exchange Online. The email signature template has been downloaded from: www.mail-signatures…

813 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

15 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now