Go Premium for a chance to win a PS4. Enter to Win

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 650
  • Last Modified:

iMac Question

Hi, I just made the switch from my PC of many years to a brand new iMac. Wow, what a beautiful machine!!!

However, I still have some applications that are Windows based and need to continue to run them. I can't switch them to the Mac version, because it would be cost prohibitive (over $2K to buy the Mac versions).

I have a 3TB SATA drive with 32GB Ram. I would like to either repartition part of the drive (about 500GB) for Windows 7 and load all my apps into that partition and dual boot, or maybe run a virtual session of Windows 7.

My question is which is better and why? Should I dual boot or should I run a virtual Windows session?

If someone can help me understand the different issues with each and which is better, I would greatly appreciate your help.

Thank you,
Fulano
0
Mr_Fulano
Asked:
Mr_Fulano
  • 5
  • 2
  • 2
  • +4
1 Solution
 
btdownloads7Commented:
Dual-booting is by far the better option in terms of performance and the overall experience. However, you would have to restart your iMac every time that you want to switch between the OSes.

Using something like Parallels or VMWare Fusion gets around this issue, but performance (both with all of the iMac  and Windows software) takes a pretty big hit.

You just have to decide what's more important to you
0
 
Dave BaldwinFixer of ProblemsCommented:
I'd keep the old Windows machine to run the things that are necessary.
0
 
Mr_FulanoAuthor Commented:
Hi btdownloads7, thanks for the advice. I was thinking along the same lines, but didn't know for sure.

Fulano
0
New feature and membership benefit!

New feature! Upgrade and increase expert visibility of your issues with Priority Questions.

 
Mr_FulanoAuthor Commented:
Hi Dave, I thought of that, but that would be too cumbersome to have 2 machines. I currently have 3 monitors on my PC, so I would have 4 in total on my desktop. -- Way too many. It would look to messy.

For a while I'm going to try and run one monitor on my PC and run dual machines, but I think in time I'll want to switch completely to the iMac.

Thanks for the advice.
Fulano
0
 
Dave BaldwinFixer of ProblemsCommented:
I have 8 machines in this room including a MacBook Pro and an Ubuntu Linux machine.  They all run different software and they all have web servers on them.  I make them talk to each other at times.  I also have 12 other machines that have special purposes that I use occasionally but I keep them out of the way.
0
 
Eoin OSullivanConsultantCommented:
If the iMac has 8Gb+ of RAM then Parallels and Fusion will work pretty well.  I've been using Parallels for years and the performance is excellent if you're doing non-CPU intensive stuff with business applications .. you might see slower performance with gaming or heavy graphic applications but remember the CPU in the iMac is probably a few years newer and faster than the PC you are replacing.

I'd probably install the VM on the Hard Drive of the iMac rather than running it from an external drive .. and if you use Parallels you can partition the HD .. and then dual boot or run as VM from within OSX so you get the best of both worlds.

I gave up dual booting a few years ago as it was rarely worth the hassle and the performance as a VM under OSX was perfectly adequate for my needs.
0
 
strungCommented:
One option is to keep the PC and set it up to accept a remote desktop connection. You can then control the PC from the Mac using either the Microsoft RDP client for Mac ( https://www.microsoft.com/mac/remote-desktop-client ) or CoRD ( http://cord.sourceforge.net ). That way, the PC will show up on the Mac monitor and be controlled by the Mac keyboard.

There will be virtually no performance hit because all the processing of the Windows apps will be done on the PC. All that happens on the Mac is that it sends keyboard and mouse instructions over your LAN to the PC and in turn received screen redraws.
0
 
Robert SaylorSenior DeveloperCommented:
Hi, one of our staff members had a Windows XP machine and an iMac both on her desk. The has to keep Windows for UPS worldship. I recently installed VMware fusion and she is loving it. The Mac is a little slower now but not by much. The VMware unify view is really nice as it seamless integrates the Windows applications on the Mac. You can also doc the Windows launch icons on the Mac launch bar and you can tell VMware to keep the Windows task bar. We put the Windows one on the left side of the screen and the Mac doc on the bottom. Very nice product for those Windows dependent applications.
0
 
DavidCommented:
Just buy and use parallels.  You can get a 30-day eval too.  Added benefit, you can do things like double-click on a spreadsheet attachement in the mac mail, and it will launch windows excel if you like.

But don't even think about using any virtualization unless you max out your RAM.
0
 
Mr_FulanoAuthor Commented:
Hi all, you've all provided very good and detailed advice. My iMac will have a 3TB HDD and 32 GB of RAM, so if I did run Parallel or Fusion, I think the 32GB of RAM could handle that.

At first I thought it would be better to use Boot Camp, but the more I think about it and the more advice I get, the more it seems that Boot Camp may not be the most effective choice, given that I typically switch between application and will continue to do so under both platforms.

I'm leaning  more towards a Parallel or a Fusion approach. So, the question then become - which one is better? Parallel or Fusion?

Thank you,
Fulano
0
 
btdownloads7Commented:
Since you have 32GB of RAM, then installting a virtual OS is probably the better choice. I prefer Parallels because it's got a better UI, but the two of them are very similar, so you really can't go wrong with either one.
0
 
strungCommented:
You can google for comparisons of Parallels and Fusion, but at the moment, the consensus seems to be that Parallels if faster.
0
 
DavidCommented:
I've used both.  Parallels is far and beyond better. Period. Like comparing Vista and Win7. It goes beyond speed.  Features, time-machine support, using apps on Mac or windows with same filesystem at same time, etc..

Buy parallels and save yourself the time of learning how much better it is than fusion and having to uninstall fusion.
0
 
Mr_FulanoAuthor Commented:
Thank you all. I've made the decision to use a virtual OS and via Parallels.

Thank you all,
Fulano
0
 
Mr_FulanoAuthor Commented:
Thank you for the solution. I think you were the first to suggest it would not be a performance hit with the amount of RAM I have.
0

Featured Post

How to Use the Help Bell

Need to boost the visibility of your question for solutions? Use the Experts Exchange Help Bell to confirm priority levels and contact subject-matter experts for question attention.  Check out this how-to article for more information.

  • 5
  • 2
  • 2
  • +4
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now