?
Solved

c# how do I pass a generic object to a forms constructor

Posted on 2013-05-23
9
Medium Priority
?
233 Views
Last Modified: 2013-06-06
For some reason, this wont' work

//wont work
        public FormXmlViewer(<T> objectToView)
//will work
        public FormXmlViewer(string objectAsStgring)
0
Comment
Question by:jackjohnson44
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 4
  • 4
9 Comments
 
LVL 42

Expert Comment

by:sedgwick
ID: 39193353
Try
Public class  FormXmlViewer<T> : Form{
public FormXmlViewer(T objectToView){
}

}
0
 

Author Comment

by:jackjohnson44
ID: 39194231
Thanks.

I tried what is below and my InitializeComponent is having an error.  Is this a problem if I want two constructors, one with a string and the other with a generic?


    public partial class FormXmlViewer<T> : Form
    {
        public FormXmlViewer(string xmlSource)
        {
            InitializeComponent();
        }
        public FormXmlViewer(T objectToView)
        {
            InitializeComponent();
        }
0
 
LVL 4

Expert Comment

by:AnuTiji
ID: 39198922
Hi

Instead of passing string as parameter, we can specify it as object and check the type before doing any function with the parameter.

public FormXmlViewer(object obj)
{
     InitializeComponent();
}
0
 [eBook] Windows Nano Server

Download this FREE eBook and learn all you need to get started with Windows Nano Server, including deployment options, remote management
and troubleshooting tips and tricks

 

Author Comment

by:jackjohnson44
ID: 39204418
Thanks, but I don't want to specify the objects in the function.  My current form has an xml string.  I also have a deserialize function that you pass an object and get back a string.

So I can currently do:
string xmlString = GetStringFromObject(myObject)  //this uses generics and works with many objects
Form myForm(xmlString)

In this scenario I never have to know the type of object.  I want to avoid having to do this in two steps and also have to edit the form for each new object.
0
 
LVL 42

Expert Comment

by:sedgwick
ID: 39204446
change this:
  public partial class FormXmlViewer<T> : Form
    {
        public FormXmlViewer(string xmlSource)
        {
            InitializeComponent();
        }
        public FormXmlViewer(T objectToView)
        {
            InitializeComponent();
        }

Open in new window


to this:

 
 public partial class FormXmlViewer<T> : Form
    {
        public FormXmlViewer(string xmlSource)
        {
            //deserialize xmlSource to T first, then call the 2nd ctor with the object.

        }
        public FormXmlViewer(T objectToView)
        {
            InitializeComponent();
        }

Open in new window

0
 
LVL 42

Accepted Solution

by:
sedgwick earned 2000 total points
ID: 39204447
u can use this 2 functions to deserialize<T> from xmlsource:
public static T XmlDeserializeFromString<T>(string objectData)
{
    return (T)XmlDeserializeFromString(objectData, typeof(T));
}

public static object XmlDeserializeFromString(string objectData, Type type)
{
    var serializer = new XmlSerializer(type);
    object result;

    using (TextReader reader = new StringReader(objectData))
    {
        result = serializer.Deserialize(reader);
    }

    return result;
}
 

Open in new window


so u ended up with:
public partial class FormXmlViewer<T> : Form
    {
        public FormXmlViewer(string xmlSource)
        {
            //deserialize xmlSource to T first, then call the 2nd ctor with the object.
FormXmlViewer(XmlDeserializeFromString<T>(xmlSource))
        }
        public FormXmlViewer(T objectToView)
        {
            InitializeComponent();
        }

Open in new window

0
 

Author Comment

by:jackjohnson44
ID: 39204526
Thanks, I tried that.  Please see my comment above posted on 2013-05-24 at 08:25:59
0
 
LVL 42

Expert Comment

by:sedgwick
ID: 39204565
look closely what i've posted, only one constructor calls InitializeComponent()
0
 

Author Comment

by:jackjohnson44
ID: 39204582
Thanks, I didn't notice that.  Can you please explain why it isn't needed?  I just thought it was always required.
0

Featured Post

Command Line Tips and Tricks

The command line is a powerful tool at the disposal of every Linux user. Although Linux distros come with beautiful user interfaces, it's worthwhile to learn the command line because it allows you to do a number of things that you otherwise cannot do from the GUI.  

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

A long time ago (May 2011), I have written an article showing you how to create a DLL using Visual Studio 2005 to be hosted in SQL Server 2005. That was valid at that time and it is still valid if you are still using these versions. You can still re…
The article shows the basic steps of integrating an HTML theme template into an ASP.NET MVC project
In this video we outline the Physical Segments view of NetCrunch network monitor. By following this brief how-to video, you will be able to learn how NetCrunch visualizes your network, how granular is the information collected, as well as where to f…
In this video, Percona Solutions Engineer Barrett Chambers discusses some of the basic syntax differences between MySQL and MongoDB. To learn more check out our webinar on MongoDB administration for MySQL DBA: https://www.percona.com/resources/we…
Suggested Courses

770 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question