Improve company productivity with a Business Account.Sign Up

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 666
  • Last Modified:

file size limits on extfat?

I've just installed a new NAS device that uses EXTFAT. I am trying to copy a 162GB file to this device and get the error: "There was not enough space for this item." Yet the drive properties show 5.2TB free. What is my problem?
0
jmarkfoley
Asked:
jmarkfoley
1 Solution
 
Haresh NikumbhSr. Tech leadCommented:
0
 
Subhashish LahaCommented:
You should check NAS device permissions. This seems to be a permission issue due to which you're not able to copy the file.
0
 
Lee W, MVPTechnology and Business Process AdvisorCommented:
ExtFAT is not a file file system.

FAT is.

exFAT is.

Ext2/3/4 is.

Which one you are using will determine your problem.

Details on Windows file systems can be found here:
http://www.ntfs.com/ntfs_vs_fat.htm

You might also have quotas enabled if the the file system is capable of handling a large file.
0
The 14th Annual Expert Award Winners

The results are in! Meet the top members of our 2017 Expert Awards. Congratulations to all who qualified!

 
Lee W, MVPTechnology and Business Process AdvisorCommented:
It's also possible your NAS uses a proprietary file system that doesn't support large files.  Could help to know WHAT NAS you're using.
0
 
jmarkfoleyAuthor Commented:
The NAS is labled Purex on the box. The device itself and all documentation are devoid of names and identifiers. It appears to be a generic box that vendors can re-label.

exFat is documented to support terabyte-plus files. takecoffe, that link you posted says, "exFAT overcomes the 4G file size limitation of FAT." exFAT file size is 16 exabytes (http://www.tech-recipes.com/rx/2801/exfat_versus_fat32_versus_ntfs)

In fact I was able to copy these large files if mounted from Linux, so I'm not sure where the limitation is. However, the NAS has proven inadaquate. It seems to drop network connection and users can only open large files (e.g. 1MB) only about 20% of the time. When restoring to the NAS from a backup it failed to copy many files. I think this device is simply not business quality. It is going back today.

I'll leave this open today for any last comments
0
 
Lee W, MVPTechnology and Business Process AdvisorCommented:
If your business has a server, then NAS devices are almost ALWAYS wastes of money in my opinion.  It's cheaper (and safer) to add additional mirrored space on the server and share that out than to add a NAS device capable of mirroring.  Unless you're going to spend $10,000+ on a large business class NAS with enterprise features... then you might want one... but most small NAS systems are (in my opinion) a waste of money - especially when you already have a server).
0
 
jmarkfoleyAuthor Commented:
leew: I'm beginning to come to the same conclusion -- waste of money.
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Featured Post

Free Tool: Site Down Detector

Helpful to verify reports of your own downtime, or to double check a downed website you are trying to access.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now