• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 989
  • Last Modified:

Cisco UC540 design

I have several questions about my project to upgrade a very old PBX @ a client site with a UC540.  Site Details:
CBeyond "Beyond Voice 1 (BV1)" phone provider, one main dial in number (no DID's, just internal extensions).  All calls ring on every phone and anyone can answer, 6 Call apperances on each phone. Service allows 6 simultaneous calls in/out.  BV1 service is a dynamic integrated service (voice and data, sharing bandwidth where needed).
Onsite SBS2003 server for all data, 6 computers with Windos XP or 7 and Office 2007.
CBeyond provides Firewall/NAT services (read managed by CBeyond).  CBeyond CPE (Cisco IAD) splits voice and data.  Voice interface is analog to current PBX.
Here is my planned design:
Install UC540 on separate network leveraging dedicated Cat5e cables to each phone connected to POE ports on UC540. Connect UC540 WAN port to existing network to allow it Internet access.
I understand this is not ideal and not using the power of the UC540 but I do not have the ability to make large changes to the data network.  I also have to consider the managed Firewall/NAT @ Cbeyond instead of a dedicated device that the UC540 could replace.
My questions are:
1) UC540 has 4 FXO ports, does that mean I can only have 4 simultaneous calls in/out (asuming the analog interface to CBeyond)?
2) Given the SBS 2003 and Office 2007, what integration options do I have (like voicemail to email, etc) if I were to fully implement the UC540 (I'm assuming not much becuase of Exchange 2003).
3) Do you have any suggestions of a better design?
0
clm000
Asked:
clm000
2 Solutions
 
arnoldCommented:
First, uc540 does not have a POE ports.
Do they have an option to provide a PRI handoff? Do you have a T1E1 card in the uc540?
Or are you planing on using the FXO ports to get the analog handoff replacing the existing PBX?(for 6 you would need to add an FXO card)

It sounds what you have is a blast group into which the single number will go and they ring an extension on each phone while each phone.  Your option can be to use a shared line or each phone have individual extensions with each extension being a member of the blast group.  It depends on how you want to handle transfer between extensions/people.
0
 
PhonebuffCommented:
First and foremost, this is not a completely true statement so be careful.  They block SIP external for their network, an some other  things but it's still a really good idea to have our own Firewall if you have anything sensitive.

CBeyond provides Firewall/NAT services (read managed by CBeyond).  CBeyond CPE (Cisco IAD) splits voice and data.  Voice interface is analog to current PBX.

Second, a BV-1 can be terminated as analog ports, SipConnect or T1/PRI from the IAD.  I would get the UC with either a T1/PRI card or SIPTrunking and then work with Cbeyond to make the change as needed.  

Lastly, why a UC, seems overkill why not a simple Asterisk box of one of the many ISO flavors.

---------------------------
0
 
clm000Author Commented:
Didn't get any answers to the question about Integration with Exchange/Outlook
0

Featured Post

Concerto's Cloud Advisory Services

Want to avoid the missteps to gaining all the benefits of the cloud? Learn more about the different assessment options from our Cloud Advisory team.

Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now