Solved

Exchange 2010 Migration from Exchange 2007 - Can I dedicate a hub-transport role to a specific server during migration?

Posted on 2013-05-29
9
510 Views
Last Modified: 2013-08-25
I have an extremely large, crowded Exchange 2007 server running all (3) Exchange roles (CAS, Hub-Transport, Mailbox).  I am migrating to a distributed Exchange 2010 environment with multiple Mailbox servers, and dedicated servers for each of CAS / Hub-Transport.

At our first migration attempt of a batch of 10 users, the server had big issues after the move with email delivery.  Delays of inbound email to users on the original Exchange 2007 server, delays of outbound email from users on the original Exchange 2007 server, BUT the users migrated to the new Exchange 2010 system experienced NO issues at all.

Inbound email from the firewall still arrives at the original Exchange 2007 Hub Transport server and that has not changed...so it does not make sense that after the migration all users still on the 2007 system were having delay issues and users on the Exchange 2010 server were NOT.  I did notice that the pre-submission queue database was quite large at the time (3+GB).  A reboot of the Exchange 2007 server eventually solved all of these delay issues, restarting individual Exchange services did not (Transport service, info store, IIS in general).

What I wanted to do to prevent this was to create a dedicated Exchange 2007 Hub-Transport server (as a VM) and bridgehead that to be the server that does the moving of messages to the Exchange 2010 systems.  How can I do this?  I feel like this would alleviate the load and let us migrate the balance of the users (almost 1000 users in total) without affecting the existing services of the already overloaded server.

Does anyone have any insight as to how this can be completed?
0
Comment
Question by:jkeegan123
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 4
  • 3
9 Comments
 
LVL 63

Accepted Solution

by:
Simon Butler (Sembee) earned 500 total points
ID: 39206392
I am pretty sure that it cannot be done as there isn't that level of control in the system.
The only thing you can do is specify the source server on the send connectors.

I would also point out that the model you have on Exchange 2007 is now the preferred design for Exchange 2010. Lots of servers all holding the three roles. I don't think I have split the roles in any design I have done in the last 18 months. The I/O requirements on Exchange 2010 have dropped considerably.

I would have all email delivered to the highest version of Exchange in the system (so preferably Exchange 2010 SP3) and let Exchange process the email, taking immediate advantage of improvements in transport handling that Exchange 2010 provides.

Simon.
0
 
LVL 5

Author Comment

by:jkeegan123
ID: 39247261
I've requested that this question be deleted for the following reason:

No acceptable answer
0
 
LVL 63

Expert Comment

by:Simon Butler (Sembee)
ID: 39247262
I object to the question being deleted.
There was no feedback from the OP, and as clearly stated, "You cannot do that" is an acceptable answer.
0
Is Your DevOps Pipeline Leaking?

Is your CI/CD pipeline a hodge-podge of randomly connected tools? You’ve likely got a tool to fix one problem & then a different tool to fix another, resulting in a cluster of tools with overlapping functionality. Learn how to optimize your pipeline with Gartner's recommendations

 
LVL 5

Author Comment

by:jkeegan123
ID: 39300146
Sorry Sembee, I didn't want to accept your answer as correct because of the comment of holding all 3 roles on all of your recent implementations.  While this is certainly a configuration that will WORK, for security reasons, I think it's best to have a front facing server (i.e. CAS in DMZ) NOT holding any mailbox / public folder data.  

As for "you can't do that" ... we are still working on the best way to do this.  We have 1500+ mailboxes waiting to migrate, and when we do, the load of messages transferring form some of the LARGER mailboxes (20GB+) causes significant delays in the inbound delivery queues...I can dedicate transport servers to specific connectors, and nail a specific connector to a namespace, but can't quite get one together that would be JUST doing transfers for moved mailboxes....when you initiate a mailbox move, it basically just creates a mailbox on the target server and mails everything there.
0
 
LVL 63

Expert Comment

by:Simon Butler (Sembee)
ID: 39303829
CAS in DMZ is not supported. Putting any role of Exchange 2007 or higher other than EDGE in a perimeter network is not supported.
Splitting the roles out does NOTHING for security.

Simon.
0
 
LVL 5

Author Comment

by:jkeegan123
ID: 39433409
Answer to question is:  NOT POSSIBLE, so this answer is technically correct.
0
 
LVL 63

Expert Comment

by:Simon Butler (Sembee)
ID: 39433446
Not possible is a correct answer, and does not justify a C grade.
0

Featured Post

Efficient way to get backups off site to Azure

This user guide provides instructions on how to deploy and configure both a StoneFly Scale Out NAS Enterprise Cloud Drive virtual machine and Veeam Cloud Connect in the Microsoft Azure Cloud.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

The new Gmail Phishing Scam going around is surprising even the savviest of users with its sophisticated techniques.
This article will help to fix the below errors for MS Exchange Server 2013 I. Certificate error "name on the security certificate is invalid or does not match the name of the site" II. Out of Office not working III. Make Internal URLs and Externa…
This tutorial will show how to configure a new Backup Exec 2012 server and move an existing database to that server with the use of the BEUtility. Install Backup Exec 2012 on the new server and apply all of the latest hotfixes and service packs. The…
Established in 1997, Technology Architects has become one of the most reputable technology solutions companies in the country. TA have been providing businesses with cost effective state-of-the-art solutions and unparalleled service that is designed…

688 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question