Solved

Segragate WIFI guest Access Points with 2 SSID's

Posted on 2013-05-30
8
843 Views
Last Modified: 2013-06-28
Hi experts

I have been asked to setup a free wireless network at work for our customers.

The boss wants it open to the customers, but i'm a little gunshy on having that on the same address scheme as our local network.

I've purchased 4 Motorola AP6532 units which have been pre-configured with 2 SSID's. 1 for the guest (which is open) & 1 for the Business (which is secured PSK). The AP's have a static IP address in the same range as the local network.

I have a HP 2620 Poe switch & a draytek router. The AP's are Poe from the switch (currently ports 21-24).

What i would like to do, if it's possible, is have the guest SSID on a different range to everything else. E.g 192.168.1/24.

That would leave the local network & SSID 2 (business use) on the same subnet, with internet access etc.

I'm a little confused how i would achieve this when the SSID's are on the AP's. If i have to assign an IP to the AP's, will the guest wifi network be able to access the internet as required?

Is this at all possible?

Thanks
0
Comment
Question by:cuadmin
  • 5
  • 3
8 Comments
 
LVL 10

Expert Comment

by:Mohammed Rahman
ID: 39209903
If I am assuming it correct, the ISP connects to Draytek Router. From Draytek, a cable is running to HP 2620.Then, 4 Motorola APs are connected to the Switch via port 21 to 24.

Looks like you can assign just ONE IP to the LAN interface to these access points. Hence, you might not be able to segregate the business (SSID 2) traffic from the local open (SSID 1)

From the manuals "http://downloads.visionid.ie/manuals/AP6532.pdf"
I see the the AP has the option to assign two SSIDs. However, there is not option to assign to LAN IPs and bind each IP with each SSID.
0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:cuadmin
ID: 39209916
"If I am assuming it correct, the ISP connects to Draytek Router. From Draytek, a cable is running to HP 2620.Then, 4 Motorola APs are connected to the Switch via port 21 to 24."

You are spot on...this is exactly how it is currently connected.

On the Draytek i've configured 'Vlan2' on port 4 & assigned it an address 192.168.1.1. The Draytek port is connected to HP port 20. On the HP i've configured a separate Vlan for ports 20-24, being the Draytek Connection & the 4 AP's.

I can get the 2 subnets talking via interlan routing on the Draytek, but i'm not sure if there's a better or more secure way of doing things. If i can't separate the SSID's, i guess i'm left with little options.
0
 
LVL 10

Accepted Solution

by:
Mohammed Rahman earned 500 total points
ID: 39210002
Assuming all 4 Motorola APs have 2 SSIDs each (business and local) so that both types of users can connect to any of the 4 available access points at any give time.

Your interest is to divide the network between business and local so that the local traffic cannot access/interfere with the business traffic (due to obvious security reasons).

Assume we have the setup as described in your post above and the APs are in BRIGDE mode and not ROUTER mode. (so that they end users can get the LAN IP address from Draytek and not APs)

User 1 is connecting as BUSINESS user and getting an IP of 192.168.1.10
User 2 is connecting as LOCAL user and getting an IP 192.168.1.11
Both, secure and open users are now on same network and doesn't serve your purpose.

Now, how will a VLAN segregate the traffic/users based on SSID? Is there an option in Draytek or the APs to associate a particular VLAN to a particular SSID?

You may attempt this:
Create two VLANs on switch.
Make Port 20 member of both VLANs (Routers port)
Make 21 and 22 member of VLAN X (Business with Wireless Key)
Make 23 and 24 member of VLAN Y (local and open network)

** This will limit the coverage as each type of user will have access to 2 APs against 4 :(
Do not enable inter VLAN routing as it will enable communication between business and local (which you do not want in the first place).

Please correct me if I am going off the track and let us know if you have any other ideas.
0
Efficient way to get backups off site to Azure

This user guide provides instructions on how to deploy and configure both a StoneFly Scale Out NAS Enterprise Cloud Drive virtual machine and Veeam Cloud Connect in the Microsoft Azure Cloud.

 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:cuadmin
ID: 39211984
Hi
Your interpretation of the network layout is spot on again :)

I'll set it up this way & let you know the results.
0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:cuadmin
ID: 39211986
On the Vlan, should the ports be tagged, untagged or something else?
0
 
LVL 10

Expert Comment

by:Mohammed Rahman
ID: 39224506
Tagging can only be done on a Trunk Port and not on Access ports.

When VLANs span multiple switches, VLAN Tagging is required. VLAN Tagging is the practice of inserting a VLAN ID into a packet header in order to identify which VLAN the packet belongs to. More specifically, switches use the VLAN ID to determine which port(s), or interface(s), to send a broadcast packet to.

In our case, we are connecting 2 APs to port 21 and 22 (that will have the wireless security enabled). And these two ports will be member of VLAN X only. Also, these ports will be Access ports and not Trunks. (Reason: We do not have the option to configure 2 SSIDs with two different IP addresses).

We are forcing port 21 and 22 to be part of one VLAN (X) and hence allowing only single network over it. As the port is configured to allow only one VLAN and not multiple, it should be forced to be in ACCESS mode.
** If you keep the port 21 and 22 as trunk, anyone from local (non secure) network can install a dummy switch emulator, make himself a member of business network VLAN and access your business network.

Hence, never configure a port as TRUNK to which the local users have access to.

So, long story short :) - Keep the port 21 and 22 as ACCESS only. So, no VLAN tagging. ONLY the port 20 must be trunk as it will have to carry two seperate VLAN traffic to Draytek router.

The same above explanation applies to port 23 and 24.
0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:cuadmin
ID: 39224671
Ok, thanks for the explanation. I'll keep you posted.
0
 
LVL 2

Author Closing Comment

by:cuadmin
ID: 39286047
Sorry for the delay in responding.

Thanks for your advice. Appreciate it.
0

Featured Post

VMware Disaster Recovery and Data Protection

In this expert guide, you’ll learn about the components of a Modern Data Center. You will use cases for the value-added capabilities of Veeam®, including combining backup and replication for VMware disaster recovery and using replication for data center migration.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Today sees the launch of a new case study, focusing on BYOD technologies we have been working with for some time now.  But with the advent of 802.11ac wireless technologies and the story behind our landmark developments, we would like to share this …
This subject  of securing wireless devices conjures up visions of your PC or mobile phone connecting to the Internet through some hotspot at Starbucks. But it is so much more than that. Let’s look at the facts: devices#sthash.eoFY7dic.
Viewers will learn how to connect to a wireless network using the network security key. They will also learn how to access the IP address and DNS server for connections that must be done manually. After setting up a router, find the network security…
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…

773 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question