?
Solved

CPU Speed or Cores for Terminal Server

Posted on 2013-05-31
5
Medium Priority
?
1,236 Views
Last Modified: 2013-05-31
I am building a new server to host Windows Server 2012 Terminal Server in Hyper-V sessions.  This will be an IBM x3550 with two CPUs.

We plan to host about 50 total users in two seperate VMs.

For the same amount of money, I can get 8 core CPUs with 20 MB cache running at 2.1 GHz or I can get 4 core CPUs with 10 MB cache running at 3.3 Ghz.

What is more important for terminal server, cores or speed?
0
Comment
Question by:richn
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
  • 2
5 Comments
 
LVL 22

Assisted Solution

by:Haresh Nikumbh
Haresh Nikumbh earned 600 total points
ID: 39211114
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:richn
ID: 39211147
That test was for VDIs.  Do we know is the same holds true for traditional terminal services sessions?
0
 
LVL 56

Accepted Solution

by:
andyalder earned 1400 total points
ID: 39211590
With anything that involves a large number of threads such as terminal server cores always win over clock speed because each thread (and therefore each core) spends a lot of its time waiting on I/O. For the same reason you should enable hyperthreading so it can push the thread that's waiting on I/O to one side and run another thread on that core instead.

http://globalsp.ts.fujitsu.com/dmsp/Publications/public/Terminal_Server_Sizing_Guide_EN.pdf
Page 16(46) shows little difference (about 10%) between 2.0 and 3.16GHz but page 20(46) shows good scaling (70%) when doubling the number of cores.
0
 
LVL 22

Expert Comment

by:Haresh Nikumbh
ID: 39211722
correct that test was done for vdi. .if its such performance for vdi then ofcourse you get better on physical
0
 
LVL 1

Author Closing Comment

by:richn
ID: 39211814
Thanks for the quick answers.
0

Featured Post

Plug and play, no additional software required!

The ATEN UE3310 USB3.1 Gen1 Extender Cable allows users to extend the distance between the computer and USB devices up to 10 m (33 ft). The UE3310 is a high-quality, cost-effective solution for professional environments such as hospitals, factories and business facilities.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

The following article is comprised of the pearls we have garnered deploying virtualization solutions since Virtual Server 2005 and subsequent 2008 RTM+ Hyper-V in standalone and clustered environments.
Resolve DNS query failed errors for Exchange
In this Micro Tutorial viewers will learn how to restore single file or folder from Bare Metal backup image of their system. Tutorial shows how to restore files and folders from system backup. Often it is not needed to restore entire system when onl…
This tutorial will walk an individual through the process of installing of Data Protection Manager on a server running Windows Server 2012 R2, including the prerequisites. Microsoft .Net 3.5 is required. To install this feature, go to Server Manager…
Suggested Courses

770 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question