Solved

Network connectivity issue with in Windows servers

Posted on 2013-06-02
12
227 Views
Last Modified: 2013-08-07
Hi,

I am facing weird problem in my network environment.

I have windows 2008 single forest & domain model. Having windows 203 & 2008 servers all are in the same data center and same network(same subnet mask). For the last 2 months I m facing the problem as from the server A- 192.168.0.23 unable to connect B -192.168.0.35.

Gateway 192.168.0.1

when I try to ping server B from Server A it is giving the error as


ping server B

Pinging 192.168.0.35 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.0.23: Destination host unreachable.


But from the server B, I am able to connect Server A. but from the both servers I can able to connect other servers. Only Server A having the issue with B. there is no other issue.

Some one can you help on this. Where it went wrong?
0
Comment
Question by:Haribaskaran
12 Comments
 

Author Comment

by:Haribaskaran
ID: 39215263
By default firewall in OS has been disabled in all servers. All the servers are in the same data center. there is no firewall in between them. It was working well earlier.
0
 
LVL 6

Expert Comment

by:FdpxAP-GJL
ID: 39215346
I assume that even after a reboot the problem still exists. What about reboot of network infrastructure?
0
 

Author Comment

by:Haribaskaran
ID: 39215398
Yes. I have rebooted both servers. still same issue. But Network side we havenot done any reboot since it involved lot of outage for other production servers.
0
 
LVL 25

Expert Comment

by:Tony Giangreco
ID: 39215477
If they are both DC's, run the Repadmin /showrepl commands and make sure replication runs properly.

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc742066(v=ws.10).aspx

If they are not both DC's, on the 1st server, edit the host file and add the 2nd server's IP and name. Then edit the host file on the 2nd server and add the IP and name of the 1st server.

This has worked for me in the past.
0
 
LVL 9

Expert Comment

by:VirastaR
ID: 39215935
Hi,

Based on your description it seems only like firewall issue.

Server A -> Server B = Not Working
Server B -> Server A = Working

The Servers hosted in a physical servers or on VMs?

Can you please check firewall once again in Server A and also check whether IPv6 is enabled,if not used please disable IPv6 and check again.

Let me know :)
0
 

Author Comment

by:Haribaskaran
ID: 39216818
Confirmed the firewall has been disabled.

Server A is VM and Server B is physical.

I installed the netmon in both servers and started capturing the packets. Now i can able to connect Server B from server A. Not sure netmon did some magic. But still the same issue in other servers there this netmon trick not worked. I beleive something strange.
0
Too many email signature updates to deal with?

Do you feel like you are taking up all of your time constantly visiting users’ desks to make changes to email signatures? Wish you could manage all signatures from one central location, easily design them and deploy them quickly to users? Well, there is an easy way!

 
LVL 10

Expert Comment

by:tmoore1962
ID: 39216846
Since 1 is a VM and the other physical, I would look at the VM's virtural switch or router configuration.  If you do a Tracert from one to the other where does the trace stop??  Depending on your VM host the VM switch can be configured for VM network access only, VM network to VM host access only, or VM network to LAN network access.
0
 

Author Comment

by:Haribaskaran
ID: 39216900
Here the outout I am getting to try to tracert from server A
G:\>tracert server B

Tracing route to SerevrB.XXXXX.org [192.168.0.35]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  2

from Server B to Server A tracert result is

G:\>tracert ServerA

Tracing route to serverA.XXXXXX.org [192.168.0.23]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  serverA.XXXXX.org [192.168.0.23]

Trace complete.
0
 
LVL 25

Expert Comment

by:Tony Giangreco
ID: 39300151
Have you resolved this issue? Any feedback?
0
 

Author Comment

by:Haribaskaran
ID: 39303498
No the issue still exisits. No resolution found so far.
0
 

Accepted Solution

by:
Haribaskaran earned 0 total points
ID: 39378754
After reconfigure the Port channel between the Blade enclosure and core switch this issue was resolved.
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:Haribaskaran
ID: 39388631
No other solution found and finally we did this option with little it outage to production envirnment.
0

Featured Post

How your wiki can always stay up-to-date

Quip doubles as a “living” wiki and a project management tool that evolves with your organization. As you finish projects in Quip, the work remains, easily accessible to all team members, new and old.
- Increase transparency
- Onboard new hires faster
- Access from mobile/offline

Join & Write a Comment

Setting up a Microsoft WSUS update system is free relatively speaking if you have hard disk space and processor capacity.   However, WSUS can be a blessing and a curse. For example, there is nothing worse than approving updates and they just have…
Learn about cloud computing and its benefits for small business owners.
This tutorial will show how to push an installation of Backup Exec to an additional server in both 2012 and 2014 versions of the software. Click on the Backup Exec button in the upper left corner. From here, select Installation and Licensing, then I…
This tutorial will walk an individual through locating and launching the BEUtility application to properly change the service account username and\or password in situation where it may be necessary or where the password has been inadvertently change…

708 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

15 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now