Solved

Ping localhost results with inconsistent results (but never less than 1ms)

Posted on 2013-06-04
3
427 Views
Last Modified: 2013-06-10
I have come across a few machines in recent times that are getting inconsistent ping reponses from localhost.  this includes machines with brand new installs.

On a windows 8 machine I note the localhost ping is consistently longer than pinging the onsite router.

Anyone have any thoughts on what could be the cause?
0
Comment
Question by:benfixit
  • 2
3 Comments
 

Accepted Solution

by:
benfixit earned 0 total points
ID: 39220977
turns out it was malwarebytes.. Standard behavour when monitoring!
0
 
LVL 18

Expert Comment

by:Akinsd
ID: 39220993
Are these doamain computers

By localhost, I'm assuming you're running the following command
C:\Users\Owner>ping localhost

Pinging Owner.test.local [::1] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms

Ping statistics for ::1:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms

Take note of the ip address the name resolves to. If ::1, it's using ipv6.  If 127.0.0.1, its using ipv4.
You can force the ping to either use ipv6 or ipv4 by appending the applicable switch


C:\Users\Owner>ping -4 localhost

Pinging Owner.test.local [127.0.0.1] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128

Ping statistics for 127.0.0.1:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms


C:\Users\Owner>ping -6 localhost

Pinging Owner.test.local [::1] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms

Ping statistics for ::1:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms

I'm adding the following just to shed more light.

Ping response time between two hosts connected to a switch =

1. Processing time for host A to package and send echo requests
2. Time it takes for the packets to get to the switch
3. Time it takes for the switch to process the packet and forward it
4. Time it takes for the packet to get to Host B
5. Time it takes host A to process and reply to the request.
6. Travel time back to Switch
7. Processing time on switch
8. Time it takes to get back to Host A
9. Processing time on Host A
 
Also
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:benfixit
ID: 39234139
100% correct
0

Featured Post

Scale it in WD Gold

With up to ten times the workload capacity of desktop drives, WD Gold hard drives employ advanced technology to deliver among the best in reliability, capacity, power efficiency and performance.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

We recently endured a series of broadcast storms that caused our ISP to shut us down for brief periods of time. After going through a multitude of tests, we determined that the issue was related to Intel NIC drivers on some new HP desktop computers …
Trying to figure out group policy inheritance and which settings apply where can be a chore.  Here's a very simple summary I've written which might help.  Keep in mind, this is just a high-level conceptual overview where I try to avoid getting bogge…
Windows 8 comes with a dramatically different user interface known as Metro. Notably missing from the new interface is a Start button and Start Menu. Many users do not like it, much preferring the interface of earlier versions — Windows 7, Windows X…
In this video, we discuss why the need for additional vertical screen space has become more important in recent years, namely, due to the transition in the marketplace of 4x3 computer screens to 16x9 and 16x10 screens (so-called widescreen format). …

863 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

27 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now