Solved

Google Earth Pro on a terminal server

Posted on 2013-06-06
8
2,832 Views
Last Modified: 2013-06-12
I've got a client that wants to use Google Earth Pro on a terminal server.  My initial thoughts and everything I have read lead me to believe this is either not possible or not a good idea.  Anyone have experience with this?  

Much thanks.
0
Comment
Question by:SupermanTB
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 4
  • 4
8 Comments
 
LVL 19

Expert Comment

by:strivoli
ID: 39228198
It is possible. Whether it is a good idea or not, depends on your scenario:
a. How many concurrent users per TS server do you have?
b. Will all these users run Earth?
c. And so on.

Earth Pro is licensed. Please read the EULA because you might break the license if you install it on TS and give it access to more than one user concurrently.
0
 

Author Comment

by:SupermanTB
ID: 39229713
Thanks for the information.  I'll be sure to read the EULA thoroughly.  Here are the answers to your questions.

a.  25 concurrent users
b. 10 running Google Earth
0
 
LVL 19

Expert Comment

by:strivoli
ID: 39230279
I don't think the 10 users will run Earth concurrently very frequently. As a result you shouldn't have any performance problems. Keep your resources monitored from some days before the Earth implementation to some days after in order to see if there is any valuable change.
0
Guide to Performance: Optimization & Monitoring

Nowadays, monitoring is a mixture of tools, systems, and codes—making it a very complex process. And with this complexity, comes variables for failure. Get DZone’s new Guide to Performance to learn how to proactively find these variables and solve them before a disruption occurs.

 

Author Comment

by:SupermanTB
ID: 39230631
This is a real estate company and they use Google Earth all the time.  All 10 may not be using at the same time, but it would be very common to have 5 or so using at the same time.  Terminal services can be very difficult with applications that require video or somehow utilize the video card.

How are you able to make such a claim?
0
 
LVL 19

Expert Comment

by:strivoli
ID: 39234041
I apologize for the delay. The info you gave about your scenario is limited. Based on that info I've made a claim with particular attention on monitoring the situation before and after. Furthermore, I've worked with TS and ICA (Citrix) for about 7 years with any kind of hosted applications (please exclude CAD/CAM applications).
No one is able to tell you how well it will work (BTW: what is "well"?) because it depends on too many factors:
a. Actual servers.
b. Their mean use during the day.
c. The response time the Earth users expect (is it less, equal or more than the response time they get when running on Home PCs?).
d. And so on.

As a result, only a deep testing will completely answer your question.
A quality level accepted in one company might not be accepted in another company.
0
 

Author Comment

by:SupermanTB
ID: 39234529
Thank you for your response.  If the information about my scenario is limited, you are welcome to ask for additional information.  

a.  I'm not sure what you're asking here.
b.  I certainly cannot give this exact estimate now, but I would like to have a ballpark indication of what is reasonable and how much usage will cause problems
c.  They will expect it to be equal to the response time they get when running Google Earth on their PCs
d.  If there is any more information you need, feel free to ask.

If after receiving the answers to those questions, a deep testing is the only way to know for sure, then I have my answer.  Thanks very much.
0
 
LVL 19

Accepted Solution

by:
strivoli earned 500 total points
ID: 39240466
Questions like the one you posted can only be (fully) answered after a deep testing on your systems with your users. We can give you some suggestions. But, that's all.
I understand this isn't exactly what you wanted. What you are asking for (a clear answer such as: yes it works and it works fine) doesn't exist because what works fine for me might not work fine for you (or for one critical User of you system).
If you think this isn't of any help, feel free to delete the question.
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:SupermanTB
ID: 39241143
I appreciate the effort, so will award points.
0

Featured Post

Free Webinar: AWS Backup & DR

Join our upcoming webinar with experts from AWS, CloudBerry Lab, and the Town of Edgartown IT to discuss best practices for simplifying online backup management and cutting costs.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

You might have come across a situation when you have Exchange 2013 server in two different sites (Production and DR). After adding the Database copy in ECP console it displays Database copy status unknown for the DR exchange server. Issue is strange…
A safe way to clean winsxs folder from your windows server 2008 R2 editions
This tutorial will walk an individual through the steps necessary to configure their installation of BackupExec 2012 to use network shared disk space. Verify that the path to the shared storage is valid and that data can be written to that location:…
This tutorial will walk an individual through the process of transferring the five major, necessary Active Directory Roles, commonly referred to as the FSMO roles to another domain controller. Log onto the new domain controller with a user account t…

733 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question