Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of cycledude
cycledudeFlag for United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

asked on

c# 2010 winforms update animated gif without using application.doevents

HI

I have an application which has a few processes which can take some time to complete, especially over the network.  So to give the user some feedback, I have a hidden panel, which I make visible once the process starts, and remove it from the screen when the process finished... in the panel I have a animated gif (ajax load type) and a message saying the system is thinking...

trouble it, the animated gif doesn't update without doing an application.doevents (putting this in makes the process take twice as long)

so is there any way for me to refresh the animated gif so that the animation will play fluid?


Cheers

CD
Avatar of AndyAinscow
AndyAinscow
Flag of Switzerland image

>>so is there any way for me to refresh the animated gif so that the animation will play fluid?


Yes, but you might not like it.
The DoEvents is to force the main thread to process any waiting messages.  Actions that take a long time to complete (such as yours) really should be done in a separate thread to allow the main thread to work normally.  So, to make your app work 'correctly' you should do the process in another thread.  (It shouldn't be too much more recoding but definately more than just adding a DoEvents in a loop somewhere).
Avatar of cycledude

ASKER

Thanks andy

How do I go about setting the process to run in a separate thread?
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of AndyAinscow
AndyAinscow
Flag of Switzerland image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
There are so many ways to achieve this, the easiest and robust one is by using backgroundworker, move your time consuming code in dowork event handler.

The other was to use Delegate

create a method for your time consuming method and call it in using BeginInvoke method.
thanks andy, thats great ;o)
sorry naman_goel, I didn't see your response before I awarded the points, otherwise you would have had a share, because your suggestion looks like it work too..