Solved

How to optimize this procedure.

Posted on 2013-06-14
11
147 Views
Last Modified: 2013-06-29
Table - gradestatistics
select Course,Subjectcode,
round(avg(cast(total as decimal(18,5))),2) as 'Avg',
round(stdev(cast(total as decimal(18,5))),2) as 'SD',
round(avg(cast(total as decimal(18,5)))+1.645*stdev(cast(total as decimal(18,5))),2) as 'xbarplus1645sd',
round(avg(cast(total as decimal(18,5)))+stdev(cast(total as decimal(18,5))),2) as 'xbarplussd',
round(avg(cast(total as decimal(18,5)))+.5*stdev(cast(total as decimal(18,5))),2) as 'xbarplus5sd',
round(avg(cast(total as decimal(18,5))),2) as 'xbar',
round(avg(cast(total as decimal(18,5)))-.5*stdev(cast(total as decimal(18,5))),2) as 'xbarminus5sd',
round(avg(cast(total as decimal(18,5)))-stdev(cast(total as decimal(18,5))),2) as 'xbarminussd',
round(avg(cast(total as decimal(18,5)))-1.645*stdev(cast(total as decimal(18,5))),2) as 'xbarminus1645sd'
into gradestatistics
from mstmassstudents
where ems not in('F','E','I','UMC','SS','',' ')  
and  ims not in('F','E','I','UMC','SS','',' ')
group by course,subjectcode
order by 1,2,3


Procedure - why taking time.
I have course, subjectcode, total based on whcih the grades are calculated for each uid,
The code is attached herewith sample data/
Procedure-Attached.txt
smap.xlsx
0
Comment
Question by:searchsanjaysharma
  • 5
  • 4
  • 2
11 Comments
 
LVL 48

Expert Comment

by:PortletPaul
ID: 39246931
why do you use a cursor based stored procedure for this and not an update statement?

one thing that strikes me you do a lot of casting within the calculations - perhaps cast total to decimal through a nested subquery - that might save some cycles.
0
 

Author Comment

by:searchsanjaysharma
ID: 39246983
Nesting has to be done, as we need to calculate avg ans stdev per subject code and based on that the formula is applied to generate the grades.
0
 
LVL 48

Expert Comment

by:PortletPaul
ID: 39247889
>>calculate avg and stdev per subject code
ok, this has to be done

use of cursor approach however remains a choice

any chance of getting some sample data from [gradestatistics]?
0
Microsoft Certification Exam 74-409

Veeam® is happy to provide the Microsoft community with a study guide prepared by MVP and MCT, Orin Thomas. This guide will take you through each of the exam objectives, helping you to prepare for and pass the examination.

 
LVL 4

Assisted Solution

by:BAKADY
BAKADY earned 167 total points
ID: 39249101
you can replace you code between beginn and end with this:
with cte_mstmassstudents as (
  select uid,
    course,
    subjectcode,
    cast(total as bigint) as total
    from mstmassstudents 
  where ems not in('F','E','I','UMC','SS','',' ')
    and  ims not in('F','E','I','UMC','SS','',' ')
    and course in ( @c )
  -- order by 1,2,3 is not really required
), cte_gradestatistics as (
  select 
    course,
    subjectcode,
    xbarplus1645sd,
    xbarplussd,
    xbarplus5sd,
    xbar,
    xbarminus5sd,
    xbarminussd,
    xbarminus1645sd
  from gradestatistics
  where course in (
    select distinct course
    from cte_mstmassstudents
  ) and subjectcode in (
    select distinct subjectcode
    from cte_mstmassstudents
  )
  -- order by 1,2 isn't required either
)
update mstmassstudents
set grade = case
  when cte_mstmassstudents.marks = 0
    then 'F'
  when cte_mstmassstudents.marks = 100
    then 'A+'
  when cte_mstmassstudents.marks >= cte_gradestatistics.xbarplus1645sd
    then 'A+'
  when cte_mstmassstudents.marks >= cte_gradestatistics.xbarplussd
   and cte_mstmassstudents.marks < cte_gradestatistics.xbarplus1645sd
    then 'A'
  when cte_mstmassstudents.marks >= cte_gradestatistics.xbarplus5sd
   and cte_mstmassstudents.marks < cte_gradestatistics.xbarplussd
    then 'B+'
  when cte_mstmassstudents.marks >= cte_gradestatistics.xbar
   and cte_mstmassstudents.marks < cte_gradestatistics.xbarplus5sd
    then 'B'
  when cte_mstmassstudents.marks >= cte_gradestatistics.xbarminus5sd
   and cte_mstmassstudents.marks < cte_gradestatistics.xbar
    then 'C+'
  when cte_mstmassstudents.marks >= cte_gradestatistics.xbarminussd
   and cte_mstmassstudents.marks < cte_gradestatistics.xbarminus5sd
    then 'C'
  when cte_mstmassstudents.marks >= cte_gradestatistics.xbarminus1645sd
   and cte_mstmassstudents.marks < cte_gradestatistics.xbarminussd
    then 'D'
  when cte_mstmassstudents.marks < cte_gradestatistics.xbarminus1645sd
    then 'F'
from mstmassstudents inner join (
  cte_mstmassstudents inner join cte_gradestatistics
     on cte_mstmassstudents.course =cte_gradestatistics.icourse
    and cte_mstmassstudents.subjectcode = cte_gradestatistics.subjectcode
  )
   on mstmassstudents.uid = cte_mstmassstudents.uid
  and cte_mstmassstudents.course = cte_mstmassstudents.course
  and cte_mstmassstudents.subjectcode = cte_mstmassstudents.subjectcode
-- maybe you need this too to update only the same records selected at cte_mstmassstudents
where ems not in('F','E','I','UMC','SS','',' ')
  and ims not in('F','E','I','UMC','SS','',' ') 

Open in new window

see the comment in the code...
it should be faster too..

regards

PS. i will be glad to get a feedback if this works like you want.
0
 
LVL 48

Assisted Solution

by:PortletPaul
PortletPaul earned 333 total points
ID: 39249318
:) scary BAKADY, exactly the direction I had in mind ... as it should be faster
(and it demonstrates that using a cursor is a choice not a necessity)

Regarding gradestatistics, the code contained in the question indicates the needed calculations are being placed into a table, and judging by the existing sproc that occurs before the sproc is called. If this is true then cte_gradstatistics could be unnecessary and direct use of the table substituted in the above. Regarding the frequent casts, this is what I had in mind
SELECT
      Course
    , Subjectcode
    , round(avg(castedtotal), 2)                              AS 'Avg'
    , round(stdev(castedtotal), 2)                            AS 'SD'
    , round(avg(castedtotal) + 1.645 * stdev(castedtotal), 2) AS 'xbarplus1645sd'
    , round(avg(castedtotal) + stdev(castedtotal), 2)         AS 'xbarplussd'
    , round(avg(castedtotal) + .5 * stdev(castedtotal), 2)    AS 'xbarplus5sd'
    , round(avg(castedtotal), 2)                              AS 'xbar'
    , round(avg(castedtotal) - .5 * stdev(castedtotal), 2)    AS 'xbarminus5sd'
    , round(avg(castedtotal) - stdev(castedtotal), 2)         AS 'xbarminussd'
    , round(avg(castedtotal) - 1.645 * stdev(castedtotal), 2) AS 'xbarminus1645sd'
INTO gradestatistics
FROM (
        SELECT
          Course
        , Subjectcode
        , cast(total AS DECIMAL(18, 5))  AS castedtotal
        FROM mstmassstudents
        WHERE ems NOT IN ('F', 'E', 'I', 'UMC', 'SS', '', ' ')
        AND ims NOT IN ('F', 'E', 'I', 'UMC', 'SS', '', ' ')
) as subset
GROUP BY course, subjectcode

Open in new window


@BAKADY is there any specific purpose you had in mind for the nested join?
{+an edit - sorry}
0
 
LVL 4

Expert Comment

by:BAKADY
ID: 39249831
@Paul: thanks...
@BAKADY is there any specific purpose you had in mind for the nested join?
@searchsanjaysharma:
i think i misunderstood the question...
i have optimize your stored procedure... it isn't bad at all, you can use it too.
But, i've noticed in PortletPaul's Comment ID#a39249318 that you generate the table "gradestatistics" with a "SELECT ... INTO ..." before the procedure runs, and you don't want to do this anymore, this because you want to nested it into the procedure, is that correct?
if this is correct, you have to add Paul's Code in my proposal for your stored procedure like this:
USE [dbtestresults]
GO
/****** Object:  StoredProcedure [dbo].[getgrades]    Script Date: 06/14/2013 09:51:28 ******/
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
ALTER procedure [dbo].[getgrades]
@c varchar(200)
as
begin

with cte_mstmassstudents as (
  select uid,
    course,
    subjectcode,
    cast(total as bigint) as total
    from mstmassstudents 
  where ems not in('F','E','I','UMC','SS','',' ')
    and  ims not in('F','E','I','UMC','SS','',' ')
    and course in ( @c )
  -- order by 1,2,3 is not really required
), cte_gradestatistics as (
-- >>>>>  PortletPaul's proposal   <<<<< --
  SELECT
        Course
      , Subjectcode
      , round(avg(castedtotal), 2)                              AS 'Avg'
      , round(stdev(castedtotal), 2)                            AS 'SD'
      , round(avg(castedtotal) + 1.645 * stdev(castedtotal), 2) AS 'xbarplus1645sd'
      , round(avg(castedtotal) + stdev(castedtotal), 2)         AS 'xbarplussd'
      , round(avg(castedtotal) + .5 * stdev(castedtotal), 2)    AS 'xbarplus5sd'
      , round(avg(castedtotal), 2)                              AS 'xbar'
      , round(avg(castedtotal) - .5 * stdev(castedtotal), 2)    AS 'xbarminus5sd'
      , round(avg(castedtotal) - stdev(castedtotal), 2)         AS 'xbarminussd'
      , round(avg(castedtotal) - 1.645 * stdev(castedtotal), 2) AS 'xbarminus1645sd'
  -- INTO gradestatistics,  is not more required
  FROM (
          SELECT
            Course
          , Subjectcode
          , cast(total AS DECIMAL(18, 5))  AS castedtotal
          FROM mstmassstudents
          WHERE ems NOT IN ('F', 'E', 'I', 'UMC', 'SS', '', ' ')
          AND ims NOT IN ('F', 'E', 'I', 'UMC', 'SS', '', ' ')
  ) as subset
  GROUP BY course, subjectcode
)
update mstmassstudents
set grade = case
  when cte_mstmassstudents.marks = 0
    then 'F'
  when cte_mstmassstudents.marks = 100
    then 'A+'
  when cte_mstmassstudents.marks >= cte_gradestatistics.xbarplus1645sd
    then 'A+'
  when cte_mstmassstudents.marks >= cte_gradestatistics.xbarplussd
   and cte_mstmassstudents.marks < cte_gradestatistics.xbarplus1645sd
    then 'A'
  when cte_mstmassstudents.marks >= cte_gradestatistics.xbarplus5sd
   and cte_mstmassstudents.marks < cte_gradestatistics.xbarplussd
    then 'B+'
  when cte_mstmassstudents.marks >= cte_gradestatistics.xbar
   and cte_mstmassstudents.marks < cte_gradestatistics.xbarplus5sd
    then 'B'
  when cte_mstmassstudents.marks >= cte_gradestatistics.xbarminus5sd
   and cte_mstmassstudents.marks < cte_gradestatistics.xbar
    then 'C+'
  when cte_mstmassstudents.marks >= cte_gradestatistics.xbarminussd
   and cte_mstmassstudents.marks < cte_gradestatistics.xbarminus5sd
    then 'C'
  when cte_mstmassstudents.marks >= cte_gradestatistics.xbarminus1645sd
   and cte_mstmassstudents.marks < cte_gradestatistics.xbarminussd
    then 'D'
  when cte_mstmassstudents.marks < cte_gradestatistics.xbarminus1645sd
    then 'F'
from mstmassstudents inner join (
  cte_mstmassstudents inner join cte_gradestatistics
     on cte_mstmassstudents.course =cte_gradestatistics.icourse
    and cte_mstmassstudents.subjectcode = cte_gradestatistics.subjectcode
  )
   on mstmassstudents.uid = cte_mstmassstudents.uid
  and cte_mstmassstudents.course = cte_mstmassstudents.course
  and cte_mstmassstudents.subjectcode = cte_mstmassstudents.subjectcode
-- maybe you need this too to update only the same records selected at cte_mstmassstudents
where ems not in('F','E','I','UMC','SS','',' ')
  and ims not in('F','E','I','UMC','SS','',' ') 
end

Open in new window


If this is correct split the points between experts...

Regards
0
 
LVL 4

Expert Comment

by:BAKADY
ID: 39249847
@PortletPaul:
:) scary BAKADY, exactly the direction I had in mind ... as it should be faster
maybe we are both from the same school, or maybe you are my lost twin...  (just kidding...)  ;)
0
 
LVL 48

Accepted Solution

by:
PortletPaul earned 333 total points
ID: 39250101
@BAKADY... hi twin :)

could you double-check those joins? e.g.
and cte_mstmassstudents.course = cte_mstmassstudents.course -- ??

I think you might mean:
FROM mstmassstudents
INNER JOIN cte_mstmassstudents ON mstmassstudents.uid = cte_mstmassstudents.uid
	AND mstmassstudents.course = cte_mstmassstudents.course
	AND mstmassstudents.subjectcode = cte_mstmassstudents.subjectcode
INNER JOIN cte_gradestatistics ON cte_mstmassstudents.course = cte_gradestatistics.icourse
	AND cte_mstmassstudents.subjectcode = cte_gradestatistics.subjectcode

Open in new window

0
 
LVL 4

Expert Comment

by:BAKADY
ID: 39250213
@PortletPaul: you're right, i forgot to clear "cte_" at the condition's left side and the "i" at icourse, "course" is correct...

@searchsanjaysharma: IMPORTANT!!!
Make this changes to get the code working!!!

PS. I'm posting this from EE's mobile version, this because I didn't post a fixed code.
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:searchsanjaysharma
ID: 39286492
tx
0
 
LVL 48

Expert Comment

by:PortletPaul
ID: 39286528
Hope you have that overall solution in place. Sorry you believe this is a C grade - see below

What grade should I award?
C should only be given for an incomplete solution that does not fully address or answer the question. A C grade should be awarded only after the asker has replied to all expert comments, provided all requested information, tried all suggested solutions, given the experts ample time to reply, and received clarification about the answer given. The asker must justify giving a C grade and give the experts an opportunity to improve it.
0

Featured Post

PRTG Network Monitor: Intuitive Network Monitoring

Network Monitoring is essential to ensure that computer systems and network devices are running. Use PRTG to monitor LANs, servers, websites, applications and devices, bandwidth, virtual environments, remote systems, IoT, and many more. PRTG is easy to set up & use.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Audit has been really one of the more interesting, most useful, yet difficult to maintain topics in the history of SQL Server. In earlier versions of SQL people had very few options for auditing in SQL Server. It typically meant using SQL Trace …
In this article I will describe the Detach & Attach method as one possible migration process and I will add the extra tasks needed for an upgrade when and where is applied so it will cover all.
In a recent question (https://www.experts-exchange.com/questions/28997919/Pagination-in-Adobe-Acrobat.html) here at Experts Exchange, a member asked how to add page numbers to a PDF file using Adobe Acrobat XI Pro. This short video Micro Tutorial sh…
Nobody understands Phishing better than an anti-spam company. That’s why we are providing Phishing Awareness Training to our customers. According to a report by Verizon, only 3% of targeted users report malicious emails to management. With compan…

777 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question