?
Solved

SAN, No SAN, iSCSI, FC

Posted on 2013-06-17
7
Medium Priority
?
648 Views
Last Modified: 2013-06-25
Experts,

I am in charge of an upcoming decision and need some more guidance. IF anyone wants to help I'd appreciate any direction possible.
We are a smaller company with bigger ideas and a smaller wallet, typical office of 22 emps.
Currently 3 local hosts with 8-15 VM's on each, NO SAN or LUN at this time.
Our current growth of data is about 300-500MB a day in combination of emails, data, and sales documents.
We were looking at a HP P2000 G3 with 24x 300GB SFF and FC with upgrading to VMware Essentials Plus (currently only have Essentials, which is no Vmotion or other snappy features). That was prices at $50k with Lic, software, FC switches, cables, 24x7warrenty.
OR a NAS with 5.4 TB of space from QNAP for about $1800, but not going to get our feet wet in updating technology. so we scrapped this idea.
We are wanting to know if its possible to get an HP P2000 with iSCSI and just add storage for data shares and email archive to a SAN device so next year we can get the FC cards, HBA and FC switches its 2/3rd the cost. This is around $15k for SAN, 2nd HP 2910al, 8x 300GB sff drives.
Basically we want at this point to ADD storage with the upgrade to a faster SAN next year and with the new SAN releases coming really soon is it also worth waiting?
Any info that anyone know about iSCSI crash course is also greatly appreciated.

Any guidance in this is appreciated.
0
Comment
Question by:Mutogi
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • +1
7 Comments
 
LVL 6

Accepted Solution

by:
BurundiLapp earned 750 total points
ID: 39253534
As I understand FC is being phased out by some vendors in the SME arena in favour of iSCSI.

FC has the edge over iSCSi in the large enterprise sector where companies have the resources to go all FC with 10gb+ interconnects, for a company with 3-500mb of data growth per day and only 22 employees you will be fine with iSCSI.  The switches are cheaper (normal gigabit ethernet switch and you don't need special NIC/HBA's).  It's recommended to have dedicated switching for the iSCSI network, keeping it seperate for the LAN to ensure performance.

We have 22tb of storage on a NetApp SAN, replicated to an identical SAN at another site, we have data growth of approx 1GB per day and we are nowhere near utilising the available bandwidth on our iSCSI backbone, we haven't even needed to enable jumbo packets yet.  We use x2 1GB iSCSI connections per host into two HP 1GB switches, the SANS have x2 1GB iSCSI connections per head, we have two heads per SAN for resiliency.

If spreading out the cost is a major factor then perhaps add redundant switching later on, however buying as much of the NAS/SAN as you require now is recommended as the more you buy in one purchase the greater discount you can command, or maybe try to negotiate a fixed price upgrade path for the next three years, that's what we did with NetApp so it is possible.

Don't be afraid to hunt around, DELL do quite a range of storage options as well ;)
0
 
LVL 122
ID: 39253605
You may want to look at iSCSI and SAS versions of the HP P2000.
0
 
LVL 3

Author Comment

by:Mutogi
ID: 39253609
Thanks for the input!

Is it possible to maske a iSCSI SAN act like a NAS device?

Can a use the SAN without upgrading our VMware soolution atnd adding $5k more to the build?

--I dont really want to add VM to the SAN at this point, just storage of emails?--

I was looking at EMC 2 years ago and just last week, seems they are still really strong in this area?
0
WordPress Tutorial 2: Terminology

An important part of learning any new piece of software is understanding the terminology it uses. Thankfully WordPress uses fairly simple names for everything that make it easy to start using the software.

 
LVL 122
ID: 39253627
You cannot really make an iSCSI device a NAS, unless the SAN/NAS supports that function, like the NetApp Filer, which supports FC, iSCSI, CIFS and NFS, so it's a NAS and SAN.

otherwise you would have to install and use VMs, and use Shares.

You can use a SAN, and not connect it to VMware.

e.g. you can connect direct to servers, via iSCSI and FC.
0
 
LVL 56

Assisted Solution

by:andyalder
andyalder earned 750 total points
ID: 39253659
For 3 hosts the best solution for host connectivity is neither fibre channel nor iSCSI but SAS; the SAS based P2000 G3 MSA has 4 SAS host ports per controller so supports up to 4 hosts in a cluster without switches. You may say that FC is 8Gb and iSCSI may be 10Gb whereas SAS is only 6Gb but that's 6Gb * 4 lanes so it's really 24Gb per host (not that you can achieve that kind of throughput with 24*15K disks anyway).

Note that the SAS host connect based MSA is not the same as the SAS based expansion shelves (P2700 etc) but contains the same RAID controller and management controller as the iSCSI or FC variant, it just has different wires to the hosts and is about the same price. The SAS HBAs for the hosts are a bit cheaper than FC HBAs though.

http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/13551_na/13551_na.pdf lsts the controllers available, as to whether you could use iSCSI for now and then FC (or SAS) later it is possible but you would either have to buy the expensive FC/iSCSI combo controllers or buy new controllers when you upgraded from iSCSI to a better protocol which is rather a waste of money since it's the controllers that cost the money.

Get whoever priced up the FC variant to price up the SAS variant for you as well, AW594B is the main unit with two SAS controllers, most of their other pricing will be the same except for the SAS host cables and HBAs. Ignore the SAS switch mentioned in the quickspecs since it's only for bladed.

N.B. Since SAS is closer coupled than FC or iSCSI I would only use the SAS variant if you have ProLiants, same with Dell's equivalent SAS connected option.
0
 
LVL 6

Expert Comment

by:BurundiLapp
ID: 39253665
Generally speaking, making a SAN act like a NAS is fairly easier, it's making a SAN act like a SAN that is the harder part, you are looking for a box that can do CIFS access, preferably with full Active Directory awareness.

I'm not that familiar with EMC, although I do know they weren't competitive when we looked at our SAN purchase approx 12 months ago, I don't know if they have any new products in the SME area now though.  We ended up deliberating between DELL Compellent and NetApp, both were very good products and very well featured, it was eventually our decision of installer that directed us towards their preferred product which was NetApp.
0
 
LVL 3

Author Closing Comment

by:Mutogi
ID: 39276412
Going with a NAS due to the overall cost and complexity.
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: IP Lookup

Get more info about an IP address or domain name, such as organization, abuse contacts and geolocation.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

When we purchase storage, we typically are advertised storage of 500GB, 1TB, 2TB and so on. However, when you actually install it into your computer, your 500GB HDD will actually show up as 465GB. Why? It has to do with the way people and computers…
The business world is becoming increasingly integrated with tech. It’s not just for a select few anymore — but what about if you have a small business? It may be easier than you think to integrate technology into your small business, and it’s likely…
How to install and configure Citrix XenApp 6.5 - Part 1. In this video tutorial we have explained step by step installation of Citrix XenApp 6.5 Server on Windows Server 2008 R2 is explained in this video. We have explained the difference between…
In this video, Percona Director of Solution Engineering Jon Tobin discusses the function and features of Percona Server for MongoDB. How Percona can help Percona can help you determine if Percona Server for MongoDB is the right solution for …
Suggested Courses

771 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question