Solved

Cisco switch config with a dumb switch

Posted on 2013-06-17
7
568 Views
Last Modified: 2013-06-18
Hi Experts,
I am have a vlan 25 assigned to a port and I need to extend that drop to more than one host, and need to connect a dumb switch to that port. All devices on that port will extend vlan 25 and no other vlans will be present on that dumb switch.

I know I need on that interface:
switchport mode access
switchport access vlan 25

Do I need to completely disable spanning-tree on that port?

Please advise.

Thanks,
Marek
0
Comment
Question by:maredzki
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
7 Comments
 
LVL 50

Expert Comment

by:Don Johnston
ID: 39254669
Do I need to completely disable spanning-tree on that port?
Nope
0
 
LVL 17

Expert Comment

by:Kvistofta
ID: 39254912
IF you disable spanning-tree on that port AND you connect 2 ports of the dumb switch to create a loop, your Cisco-switch would not prevent that from happen.

So I would say that you SHOULD keep spanning-tree running on that port to avoid that from happening.

Regards
Jimmy
0
 
LVL 50

Expert Comment

by:Don Johnston
ID: 39254918
If two ports on the dumb switch are connected, spanning tree won't help.
0
What is SQL Server and how does it work?

The purpose of this paper is to provide you background on SQL Server. It’s your self-study guide for learning fundamentals. It includes both the history of SQL and its technical basics. Concepts and definitions will form the solid foundation of your future DBA expertise.

 
LVL 17

Expert Comment

by:Kvistofta
ID: 39254940
Yeah, because the Cisco-switch will see his own BPDU:s coming back.
0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:maredzki
ID: 39256187
So what do you guys suggest, keep spanning-tree there with portfast or other setting? The reason I ask is that the cisco switch warns when you set spanning-tree portfast on a port that if you have the port connected to a hub, switch, bridge etc it will cause issues.

Marek
0
 
LVL 50

Accepted Solution

by:
Don Johnston earned 250 total points
ID: 39256225
I'd keep STP on. Because there's nothing to gain by turning it off.

Portfast on offers no benefit so that won't matter.
0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:maredzki
ID: 39256313
Ok, I will keep the seettings I have and use them for the port connecting to the dumb switch:

spanning-tree portfast
switchport mode access
switchport access vlan 25
0

Featured Post

Gigs: Get Your Project Delivered by an Expert

Select from freelancers specializing in everything from database administration to programming, who have proven themselves as experts in their field. Hire the best, collaborate easily, pay securely and get projects done right.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
asset management of client side devices laptops/computers 1 55
Fortigate 100D NTP Issue 4 78
How to limit traffic to Netscaler 10.5 VIP 3 64
Etherchannel balancing 10 20
If you are thinking of adopting cloud services, or just curious as to what ‘the cloud’ can offer then the leader according to Gartner for Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) is Amazon Web Services (AWS).  When I started using AWS I was completely new…
Use of TCL script on Cisco devices:  - create file and merge it with running configuration to apply configuration changes
This video gives you a great overview about bandwidth monitoring with SNMP and WMI with our network monitoring solution PRTG Network Monitor (https://www.paessler.com/prtg). If you're looking for how to monitor bandwidth using netflow or packet s…
In this tutorial you'll learn about bandwidth monitoring with flows and packet sniffing with our network monitoring solution PRTG Network Monitor (https://www.paessler.com/prtg). If you're interested in additional methods for monitoring bandwidt…

786 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question