Solved

Cisco switch config with a dumb switch

Posted on 2013-06-17
7
572 Views
Last Modified: 2013-06-18
Hi Experts,
I am have a vlan 25 assigned to a port and I need to extend that drop to more than one host, and need to connect a dumb switch to that port. All devices on that port will extend vlan 25 and no other vlans will be present on that dumb switch.

I know I need on that interface:
switchport mode access
switchport access vlan 25

Do I need to completely disable spanning-tree on that port?

Please advise.

Thanks,
Marek
0
Comment
Question by:maredzki
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
7 Comments
 
LVL 50

Expert Comment

by:Don Johnston
ID: 39254669
Do I need to completely disable spanning-tree on that port?
Nope
0
 
LVL 17

Expert Comment

by:Kvistofta
ID: 39254912
IF you disable spanning-tree on that port AND you connect 2 ports of the dumb switch to create a loop, your Cisco-switch would not prevent that from happen.

So I would say that you SHOULD keep spanning-tree running on that port to avoid that from happening.

Regards
Jimmy
0
 
LVL 50

Expert Comment

by:Don Johnston
ID: 39254918
If two ports on the dumb switch are connected, spanning tree won't help.
0
Easy, flexible multimedia distribution & control

Coming soon!  Ideal for large-scale A/V applications, ATEN's VM3200 Modular Matrix Switch is an all-in-one solution that simplifies video wall integration. Easily customize display layouts to see what you want, how you want it in 4k.

 
LVL 17

Expert Comment

by:Kvistofta
ID: 39254940
Yeah, because the Cisco-switch will see his own BPDU:s coming back.
0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:maredzki
ID: 39256187
So what do you guys suggest, keep spanning-tree there with portfast or other setting? The reason I ask is that the cisco switch warns when you set spanning-tree portfast on a port that if you have the port connected to a hub, switch, bridge etc it will cause issues.

Marek
0
 
LVL 50

Accepted Solution

by:
Don Johnston earned 250 total points
ID: 39256225
I'd keep STP on. Because there's nothing to gain by turning it off.

Portfast on offers no benefit so that won't matter.
0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:maredzki
ID: 39256313
Ok, I will keep the seettings I have and use them for the port connecting to the dumb switch:

spanning-tree portfast
switchport mode access
switchport access vlan 25
0

Featured Post

Secure Your Active Directory - April 20, 2017

Active Directory plays a critical role in your company’s IT infrastructure and keeping it secure in today’s hacker-infested world is a must.
Microsoft published 300+ pages of guidance, but who has the time, money, and resources to implement? Register now to find an easier way.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

PRTG Network Monitor lets you monitor your bandwidth usage, so you know who is using up your bandwidth, and what they're using it for.
Use of TCL script on Cisco devices:  - create file and merge it with running configuration to apply configuration changes
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
Here's a very brief overview of the methods PRTG Network Monitor (https://www.paessler.com/prtg) offers for monitoring bandwidth, to help you decide which methods you´d like to investigate in more detail.  The methods are covered in more detail in o…

730 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question