Go Premium for a chance to win a PS4. Enter to Win

x
?
Solved

Exchange 2010 coexistence Routing Groups

Posted on 2013-06-22
9
Medium Priority
?
228 Views
Last Modified: 2014-02-11
Hi,

 In my existing setup, I have one exchange 2003 bridgehead which accepts and send all traffic to and from the internet and then three other Exchange 2003 on other sites which all route through this bridgehead.  I am soon replacing the existing bridgehead with an Exchange 2010 server but wanted to ask what way the routing groups will be setup to allow the other three existing Exchange 2003 servers to send/receive mail (between the other exchange servers and to/from the internet).

I setup a test connector between one other 2003 sites and the 2010 exchange (soon to be bridgehead) and the test mail I sent just continued to go via the existing bridge head.  What am I missing?

Cheers
0
Comment
Question by:minniejp
  • 4
  • 3
7 Comments
 

Author Comment

by:minniejp
ID: 39268993
Any ideas?
0
 
LVL 27

Accepted Solution

by:
Steve earned 2000 total points
ID: 39271210
I like a challenge, particularly when everyone else avoids it :-)....

So to confirm, you are replacing the main 2003 server that handles all incoming/outgoing mail on behalf of your branch servers?

Have you followed any particular guide or plan for this?

Assuming the new 2010 server is setup and can see the other servers by name etc?

To see what connectors are already in place, use:
Get-RoutingGroupConnector

Open in new window


You'll need the following command to set up new connectors:

New-RoutingGroupConnector -Name “Nameofconnector” -SourceTransportServers “Exch2010.domain.com" -TargetTransportServers “Exch2003.domain.com” -Cost 10 -Bidirectional $true -PublicFolderReferralsEnabled $true

Open in new window


Amend the connector name, server names & costs as you see fit.

concentrate on getting mail flowing internally before you consider amending incoming/outgoing flow.

to test, use (or create) a mailbox on each server and try sending between them to confirm all servers can see each test mailbox.
0
 

Author Comment

by:minniejp
ID: 39274064
Great glad to hear it!

Email flow is like this:

Windows 2003 Exchange - Bridge Head Handles all mail bound for internet and all mail coming in from the internet.  It then sends to the mailbox in question regardless of what Exchange 2003/2010 server the mailbox resides.


Now that mail is working on the Exchange 2010 server that will replace the Exchange 2003 Server, as the 2003 exchange is the bridgehead, I need to make sure once it is gone, all mail still works.  The Exchange 2010 will be the main exchange accepting mail from the internet and sending mail to the internet.  Its the internal flow that I am now worried about.  I have created a connector between the Exchange 2010 box and one of the other Exchange 2003 boxes but when I check, the main is still going through the current bridge head and then to the Exchange 2010 server....I need it to go straight to the Exchange 2010 server and bypass the current bridge head.....

Maybe this is now the correct thinking but the current bridge head will be disappearing and I have yet to upgrade the other Exchange 2003 servers to Exchange 2010.

Cheers!
0
Concerto Cloud for Software Providers & ISVs

Can Concerto Cloud Services help you focus on evolving your application offerings, while delivering the best cloud experience to your customers? From DevOps to revenue models and customer support, the answer is yes!

Learn how Concerto can help you.

 

Author Comment

by:minniejp
ID: 39276271
Any thoughts?  Surely other people have had this setup...
0
 
LVL 27

Expert Comment

by:Steve
ID: 39278048
have you created the connectors as advised and have to tried to send an internal mail between mailboxes on each server to check connectivity internally?
0
 

Author Comment

by:minniejp
ID: 39279637
Yes, I have created a connector between one of the Exchange 2003 boxes and the Exchange 2010.  When I send a test email, the email goes to the original Exchange 2003 Bridgehead and is then delivered to the Exchagne 2010 server.  I went the mail to bypass the bridgehead.....
0
 
LVL 27

Expert Comment

by:Steve
ID: 39280595
as advised above, set up connectors for all servers before performing your tests.

also, check if you have the 23003 server set as a 'front end' server as this may be forcing it to be used for all traffic regardless.
0

Featured Post

What does it mean to be "Always On"?

Is your cloud always on? With an Always On cloud you won't have to worry about downtime for maintenance or software application code updates, ensuring that your bottom line isn't affected.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Eseutil Hard Recovery is part of exchange tool and ensures Exchange mailbox data recovery when mailbox gets corrupt due to some problem on Exchange server.
If you have come across a situation where you need to find some EDB mailbox recovery techniques, then here you will find the same. In this article, we will take you through three techniques using which you will be able to perform EDB recovery. You …
Sending a Secure fax is easy with eFax Corporate (http://www.enterprise.efax.com). First, just open a new email message. In the To field, type your recipient's fax number @efaxsend.com. You can even send a secure international fax — just include t…
The Email Laundry PDF encryption service allows companies to send confidential encrypted  emails to anybody. The PDF document can also contain attachments that are embedded in the encrypted PDF. The password is randomly generated by The Email Laundr…
Suggested Courses

877 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question