?
Solved

Port 3 of ASA 5510 firewall use to let outside traffic through to VPN router.

Posted on 2013-06-25
8
Medium Priority
?
465 Views
Last Modified: 2013-06-26
Dear Experts,

I need to let an ASA 5510 port let outside traffic pass though. I made its security 0 and gave it neither an external or internal IP address. That is the question. What else should I do to that port to it lets VPN traffic pass from another office to a cisco VPN router.

This is what it looks like:

interface Ethernet0/3
 nameif To_VPN_router
 security-level 0
 no ip address

Will this let outside traffic pass to the Cisco VPN Router?
0
Comment
Question by:marceloNYC
  • 4
  • 4
8 Comments
 
LVL 17

Expert Comment

by:Marius Gunnerud
ID: 39274691
Well the interface would need an IP. It is required that it has connectivity to the remote site, or remote users if it is remote access VPN.  Once you have established connectivity to the outside host/hosts and assuming that the VPN is configured correctly, things will start to work.
0
 

Author Comment

by:marceloNYC
ID: 39274717
Yeah the VPN router is working right now using another ISP. We had change ISP and have no other interface available other than the one from the ASA. So you are saying I need to give this interface an external IP address and what else?

Should I use a switch instead?

I need to make the VPN router change its way to the internet over the ASA.
0
 
LVL 17

Expert Comment

by:Marius Gunnerud
ID: 39274740
If you could elaborate a bit more on what you are trying to do please.

Right now, yes you need an IP on the interface, also you would need to configure routing out that interface.  depending on your requirements you would either set up static routes pointing out that interface or you would set up a default route.  I would need to know more about your situation.  Will this be your primary ISP?  Will the ASA be the default gateway for your hosts? Will the existing VPN router still be used for something? will the existing ISP that the VPN router is using still be used?  Is the ASA only going to be used for VPN?
0
Veeam Disaster Recovery in Microsoft Azure

Veeam PN for Microsoft Azure is a FREE solution designed to simplify and automate the setup of a DR site in Microsoft Azure using lightweight software-defined networking. It reduces the complexity of VPN deployments and is designed for businesses of ALL sizes.

 

Author Comment

by:marceloNYC
ID: 39275064
Okay, I need to make the VPN router access the internet with the new ISP. I have a ASA firewall connected to the AT&T Router. There is only one ISP now the other two and going to be discontinue.

I don't want the ASA to be the default gateway of the VPN router.

The ASA is not going to be use for site to site VPN .
 
The existent VPN router needs to change its public IP address and access to the web. Using the access the ASA has right now.  

So is it easier to use that 3rd port in the ASA firewall or should I put a switch in between the  ISP (AT&T router) with the ASA and VPN router.

remote vpn offices <--------------------------------------> ISP  AT&T router <---> ASA 5510


How do I get the VPN router to work with that order above. It is going to have its dedicated ISP line discontinue.
0
 
LVL 17

Expert Comment

by:Marius Gunnerud
ID: 39275973
I would give the AT&T router the new public IP if it doesnt have it allready, then assign an IP to the inside interface of the AT&T router (or is it configured as the DHCP server?), then ad an IP to the ASA outside interface so that it has connectivity with the router, then configure access rules, NAT (if needed), and routing so that the ASA can reach the remote clients (again if needed) and the internet.
0
 

Author Comment

by:marceloNYC
ID: 39276075
No, The AT&T router is not managed by me. I have our Cisco VPN router and that ASA behind the AT&T router to the internet. I am thinking of using 3 switch ports in a switch with its own VLAN. I need to figure that one out. I am not liking using the third port for the ASA Anymore.
0
 
LVL 17

Accepted Solution

by:
Marius Gunnerud earned 1500 total points
ID: 39277156
In this case, yes a switch would be the easiest to get this working.
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:marceloNYC
ID: 39278195
Thank you for your time on this. It is good to have an experts opinion on the side :)
0

Featured Post

Industry Leaders: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

This article is in regards to the Cisco QSFP-4SFP10G-CU1M cables, which are designed to uplink/downlink 40GB ports to 10GB SFP ports. I recently experienced this and found very little configuration documentation on how these are supposed to be confi…
As managed cloud service providers, we often get asked to intervene when cloud deployments go awry. Attracted by apparent ease-of-use, flexibility and low computing costs, companies quickly adopt leading public cloud platforms such as Amazon Web Ser…
As a trusted technology advisor to your customers you are likely getting the daily question of, ‘should I put this in the cloud?’ As customer demands for cloud services increases, companies will see a shift from traditional buying patterns to new…
Both in life and business – not all partnerships are created equal. Spend 30 short minutes with us to learn:   • Key questions to ask when considering a partnership to accelerate your business into the cloud • Pitfalls and mistakes other partners…

839 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question