• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 1578
  • Last Modified:

Hyper-V Core Performance RAID 5 vs. RAID 6

I am spec'ing out new servers for a couple of regional offices.  On each server (Dell PowerEdge T420) I plan to run MS Server 2012 Hyper-V Core and then virtualize 4 servers: an RODC, print server, file server (for IT files), local image server, and a win 7 test machine.

I am looking at using a PERC H710 with 1GB Cache and two arrays:
1st: RAID 1, 2 146GB SAS 15k 6Gbps (hyper visor)
2nd: RAID 6 5 300GB SAS 15k 6Gbps (all vm's)

I am going with two quad core processors and was planning on 32GB RAM.

My question is this:

Is RAID 6, with it's two write operations, best suited here?  This is a regional office and really only uses their local server to connect to headquarters via WAN - hence the RODC.  The only thing that I need locally is a print server and the file server that will be used by IT when we need to push out 3rd party updates.  I think that RAID 10 might be a bit faster- but the regional offices are far from HQ and hard to service in the event of an emergency so I tend to want to go with redundancy over performance so long as the hit isn't to bad.

From what I have read here so far- it seems to me as though I can expect the same or better read times from R6 but writes will be slower by a constant value due to the second parity disk.  RAID 10 on the other hand will be faster, but require 2 more disks to get the same space if I want to have a hot spare.  If I use RAID 6 and have a failure- I can always wait until after business hours to do the rebuild as I have enough redundancy.

Realizing that this may be a bit of religious debate- I am interested to hear what the community at Experts Exchange think.

Thank you!
0
EJIT
Asked:
EJIT
1 Solution
 
Eddie-LopezCommented:
Hi,

There is no right or wrong in RAID selection, it depends entirely on your needs. If faster disk writing is the top priority in your business, then RAID 5 is the right choice. If disk disk writing is not that important, but data protection is, then go for RAID 6.

And then RAID 10 would give you a boost in both I/O speed and protection, but it is a more expensive choice (since your usable disk space will be less).

I would say if you can afford the extra disks, go with RAID 10 and get the best of both worlds. If not, then make a choice between RAID 5 and 6 based on what's stated above.

Best Regards,

Eddie
1
 
Gerald ConnollyCommented:
I think you are looking at this the wrong way? You should not be concentrating on performance, but on, will my data be available when i want it to be? even under fault conditions.

With todays big disks it is imperative that you use either RAID10 or RAID-6 for mission critical applications
0

Featured Post

Concerto Cloud for Software Providers & ISVs

Can Concerto Cloud Services help you focus on evolving your application offerings, while delivering the best cloud experience to your customers? From DevOps to revenue models and customer support, the answer is yes!

Learn how Concerto can help you.

Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now