Improve company productivity with a Business Account.Sign Up


I want two Raids on a server, what do I need,

Posted on 2013-06-27
Medium Priority
Last Modified: 2016-06-26
I have an IBM System x3500 server that at present has 3 IBM drives in a raid 5 array.   I am upgrading from 2003 Server standard R2 to 2008 Server Standard R2.    The drives are 73.4 Gb 10K SAS drives.   I want to add a second array with 3 1 TB 10K Western Digital SAS drives in a RAID 5.   Can I run two different arrays with these different size drives, and do I need a separate controller card to run this second array.

The first array with the with the smaller drives is going to run 3 servers (2 virtual).   The second array is going to be the Data drive.

Can this be done as I have asked above, and do I need the 2nd controller card, or anything else?
Question by:syssolut
  • 2
  • 2
LVL 10

Expert Comment

by:Subhashish Laha
ID: 39281593
You can run multiple RAID arrays on single RAID controller. Just make sure that for each RAID array - you use same size HDDs.

Author Comment

ID: 39281605
BUt can one raid array run on the 3 73.4 Gb drives and the 2nd array run on 1 TB drives?  On that same controller?
LVL 10

Accepted Solution

Subhashish Laha earned 2000 total points
ID: 39281649
Yes, we have many servers on customer location where on 1 RAID controller - we  have attached Total 6 Disks -

2 x 100 GB disks   - created RAID 1

4 X 1 TB disks - created RAID 5 or RAID 10

Expert Comment

by:Matthew England
ID: 39281737
Each RAID Controller card has different supported configurations. Most controllers will allow you to configure at least two different arrays, althoguh some onboard controllers are limited to one. You should consult the maufacturer documentation for the controller installed to determine it's capabilities.

The ServeRAID M1015 controller, forexample, supports up to 16 arrays, so you should have no problem addding the additiona RAID 5 array as you want.

That said however, you may want to look in to creating a single larger 6 disk array instead of two 3 disk arrays. By having a larger array you'll lose less capacity to parity data, and increase performance of your VM's by writing data across a larger set of disks. If you're using HyperV for virtualization, you can then still configure Quota's to or create a logical partition at the OS level to help keep the data and VM disk space allocations as desired. (Although as previously mentioned, you'd want to ensure all the disks in the array are the same size.)

Author Closing Comment

ID: 39281765
Great, thanks for the information and quick turnaround.
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

I was prompted to write this article after the recent World-Wide Ransomware outbreak. For years now, System Administrators around the world have used the excuse of "Waiting a Bit" before applying Security Patch Updates. This type of reasoning to me …
New style of hardware planning for Microsoft Exchange server.
This tutorial will walk an individual through the steps necessary to configure their installation of BackupExec 2012 to use network shared disk space. Verify that the path to the shared storage is valid and that data can be written to that location:…
This tutorial will walk an individual through the steps necessary to install and configure the Windows Server Backup Utility. Directly connect an external storage device such as a USB drive, or CD\DVD burner: If the device is a USB drive, ensure i…

595 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question