Solved

How to build a reusable testcase libray?

Posted on 2013-07-01
2
390 Views
Last Modified: 2013-12-13
Hi,

I hope I am asking this correctly.

I was wondering if I can get a guidance or example on how to go about building a JUnit reusable testcase library.

If I am testing a method that checks for a string, I would like to create one testcase and use that over and over again on my other project.

If I am comparing integers on a method, I wouldl ike to write up one testcase and use that in other projects.

I don't know if this is done regularly by other programmers.
Any advise will be greatly appreicated.
0
Comment
Question by:dkim18
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
2 Comments
 
LVL 35

Accepted Solution

by:
girionis earned 250 total points
ID: 39292379
You can write a superclass with all the necessary test methods you need, and then extend this class with every test case. By doing so you can reuse the commonly used test cases and you can define specific functionality in each subclass.
0
 
LVL 29

Assisted Solution

by:pepr
pepr earned 250 total points
ID: 39292384
Independently on a language and a unit test framework... When you want to reuse the method in other projects, how would you do that? If you find a bug in the method (in future), how would you fix the bug in all the projects?

The simple but labour-intensive way is to copy the code of the method to the other projects from one of the projects that you consider a referential one. It can be a project that is used just for the development and for testing of that method. When you find the bug in the methode elsewhere, you write the new test for the reference project and fix the code there. Then you copy the code of the method to the other projects.

The alternative way is to create the library/package for implementing the functionality. After fixing the bug you only rebuild the project that depend on the functionality. This is probably what should be prefered. However, it may be the case that the first approach is more economic at first. It depends on more things.

Definitely, you should start somehow (with unit testing...). Then you gradually gain the experience, and you will know what next.
0

Featured Post

Ransomware-A Revenue Bonanza for Service Providers

Ransomware – malware that gets on your customers’ computers, encrypts their data, and extorts a hefty ransom for the decryption keys – is a surging new threat.  The purpose of this eBook is to educate the reader about ransomware attacks.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
maven not picking latest jar instead picking old jar from .m2 12 72
Problem to Office 1 63
Java array 10 84
Software to convert png to .ico 17 71
In our personal lives, we have well-designed consumer apps to delight us and make even the most complex transactions simple. Many enterprise applications, however, are a bit behind the times. For an enterprise app to be successful in today's tech wo…
Basic understanding on "OO- Object Orientation" is needed for designing a logical solution to solve a problem. Basic OOAD is a prerequisite for a coder to ensure that they follow the basic design of OO. This would help developers to understand the b…
The viewer will learn how to user default arguments when defining functions. This method of defining functions will be contrasted with the non-default-argument of defining functions.
The viewer will learn how to clear a vector as well as how to detect empty vectors in C++.

738 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question