Comptx
asked on
cisco 2911 Comcast 100Mbit WAN line slow
hi, without the router I can reach the advertised speeds of 100MBits down and 20 Mbits up.
if I use the router speed tests GREATELY vary
I can get anywhere form about 75Mbits all the way down to 12Mbits down.
downloading stuff when connected directly to the modem is extremely fast, about 1GB per minute.
downloading thru the cisco my speeds come down from 12MBps to about 3-6MBps
there is no QoS enabled on the router. and wan connects to a gigabit interface.
if I use the router speed tests GREATELY vary
I can get anywhere form about 75Mbits all the way down to 12Mbits down.
downloading stuff when connected directly to the modem is extremely fast, about 1GB per minute.
downloading thru the cisco my speeds come down from 12MBps to about 3-6MBps
there is no QoS enabled on the router. and wan connects to a gigabit interface.
ASKER
here it is.
currently using gigabit 0/0 and 0/1
you can ignore the other ones as they are not in use
EE-ProdComcastRunningConfig.txt
currently using gigabit 0/0 and 0/1
you can ignore the other ones as they are not in use
EE-ProdComcastRunningConfig.txt
SOLUTION
membership
Create a free account to see this answer
Signing up is free and takes 30 seconds. No credit card required.
SOLUTION
membership
Create a free account to see this answer
Signing up is free and takes 30 seconds. No credit card required.
ASKER
when idle cpu was 0%, downloading a file CPU was 35%
not sure what else to look for on those results
not sure what else to look for on those results
what is your
sh process cpu his
graph show..in idle case
sh process cpu his
graph show..in idle case
ASKER
Router  10:09:46 AM Wednesday Jul 3 2013 PCTime
   33333        1111111111111111111122222   11111
 100
  90
  80
  70
  60
  50
  40
  30
  20
  10
   0....5....1....1....2....2 ....3....3 ....4....4 ....5....5 ....6
        0   5   0   5   0   5   0   5   0   5   0
        CPU% per second (last 60 seconds)
      6 13  3  235                2414 4   1
   23224312067394204422222222 2222222222 2222222222 2339422343 2224
 100
  90
  80
  70
  60    *
  50    *      *
  40    *  *  *   *                 * * *
  30    *  *  *  **                ** * *
  20    *  *  *  *##                ** * #
  10    # *#* #  *##                ##*# #   *
   0....5....1....1....2....2 ....3....3 ....4....4 ....5....5 ....6
        0   5   0   5   0   5   0   5   0   5   0
        CPU% per minute (last 60 minutes)
       * = maximum CPU%  # = average CPU%
   41212131222212121235312222 1222113322 2222221224
   49641908160156917609279040 7578681174 3602234324
 100
  90
  80
  70
  60           *
  50           *
  40 *          *             *
  30 * *  *  *  *  **** *   ***  ***  *    *
  20 *** ************************** ********** ** ***
  10 ************************** ********** **********
   0....5....1....1....2....2 ....3....3 ....4....4 ....5....5 ....6....6 ....7..
        0   5   0   5   0   5   0   5   0   5   0   5   0
          CPU% per hour (last 72 hours)
         * = maximum CPU%  # = average CPU%
   33333        1111111111111111111122222   11111
 100
  90
  80
  70
  60
  50
  40
  30
  20
  10
   0....5....1....1....2....2
        0   5   0   5   0   5   0   5   0   5   0
        CPU% per second (last 60 seconds)
      6 13  3  235                2414 4   1
   23224312067394204422222222
 100
  90
  80
  70
  60    *
  50    *      *
  40    *  *  *   *                 * * *
  30    *  *  *  **                ** * *
  20    *  *  *  *##                ** * #
  10    # *#* #  *##                ##*# #   *
   0....5....1....1....2....2
        0   5   0   5   0   5   0   5   0   5   0
        CPU% per minute (last 60 minutes)
       * = maximum CPU%  # = average CPU%
   41212131222212121235312222
   49641908160156917609279040
 100
  90
  80
  70
  60           *
  50           *
  40 *          *             *
  30 * *  *  *  *  **** *   ***  ***  *    *
  20 *** **************************
  10 **************************
   0....5....1....1....2....2
        0   5   0   5   0   5   0   5   0   5   0   5   0
          CPU% per hour (last 72 hours)
         * = maximum CPU%  # = average CPU%
if this is idle situation graph...then there is problem because your CPU is at 60%
busy without business...
busy without business...
BTW what is the IOS version you are using??
ASKER
well it shows the last 60 minutes, so its showing you the parts wheen I put load on it
ASKER
c2900-universalk9-mz.SPA.1 53-1.T.bin
try to use M series..
M4 onwards
M4 onwards
ASKER
M series? whats the difference?
ASKER
ok my contract is expired so it doesn't allow me to download from there. looking for alternate download locations now
I avoid the "T" train IOS versions.
same here
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
Create a free account to see this answer
Signing up is free and takes 30 seconds. No credit card required.
ASKER
nice, that seems to have helped with the speed tests. they all show 100mbps+ on all tests.
however.. downloads from websites (using microsoft licensing webpage for testing) cant seem to maintain or most of the time reach 11-12MBps download rate that i get when directly plugged in to the modem.
tested 10 times with router and 10 times directly to modem.
everytime with the router it could only mantain about 6-7 then starts dropping the rate while directly plugged to the modem 10 out of 10 times it mantained atleast 11MBps rate which about double of the router.
what else could be making the router slow down the rate?
however.. downloads from websites (using microsoft licensing webpage for testing) cant seem to maintain or most of the time reach 11-12MBps download rate that i get when directly plugged in to the modem.
tested 10 times with router and 10 times directly to modem.
everytime with the router it could only mantain about 6-7 then starts dropping the rate while directly plugged to the modem 10 out of 10 times it mantained atleast 11MBps rate which about double of the router.
what else could be making the router slow down the rate?
ok...so now u upgraded the IOS..
so can u see one command on your WAN interface.
can you copy paste
sh run <<wan int>>
so can u see one command on your WAN interface.
can you copy paste
sh run <<wan int>>
ASKER
#sh run interface gigabitethernet 0/0
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 327 bytes
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
 description $ETH-WAN$$FW_OUTSIDE$
 ip address 162.*.*.65 255.255.255.240
 ip access-group 126 in
 no ip redirects
 no ip unreachables
 no ip proxy-arp
 ip nat outside
 ip virtual-reassembly in
 zone-member security out-zone
 duplex auto
 speed auto
 no mop enabled
 crypto map SDM_CMAP_1
end
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 327 bytes
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
 description $ETH-WAN$$FW_OUTSIDE$
 ip address 162.*.*.65 255.255.255.240
 ip access-group 126 in
 no ip redirects
 no ip unreachables
 no ip proxy-arp
 ip nat outside
 ip virtual-reassembly in
 zone-member security out-zone
 duplex auto
 speed auto
 no mop enabled
 crypto map SDM_CMAP_1
end
which IOS you used?
Backup. IOS level has nothing to do with this.
Please confirm:
Now after implementing changes I suggested in my previous post the speed test indicates ~100Mbps; correct?
You have indicated that your actual download speed is still not the same; correct? Then please confirm/comment the items below:
When connected to the router your traffic is traveling thru the tunnel connected to 65.*.*.70. Whose address is 65.*.*.70?
On the tunnel interface you are parsing and inspecting all traffic according to "zone-member security gre-zone". Try your test with removing this condition from the tunnel interface. If successful, then you need to evaluate the need for inspecting traffic
Please confirm:
Now after implementing changes I suggested in my previous post the speed test indicates ~100Mbps; correct?
You have indicated that your actual download speed is still not the same; correct? Then please confirm/comment the items below:
When connected to the router your traffic is traveling thru the tunnel connected to 65.*.*.70. Whose address is 65.*.*.70?
On the tunnel interface you are parsing and inspecting all traffic according to "zone-member security gre-zone". Try your test with removing this condition from the tunnel interface. If successful, then you need to evaluate the need for inspecting traffic
int gi0/0
should take this command
rj45-auto-detect-polarity <<enable/disbale>>
just enable it..
also show me..
sh int gi0/0
should take this command
rj45-auto-detect-polarity <<enable/disbale>>
just enable it..
also show me..
sh int gi0/0
ASKER
yes tests show 100mbps
tunel101 65.*.*.70 is a vpn peer in our production 2911. not being used in the comcast 2911 which we are troubleshoting until speed issue is resolved.
right now not going thru any vpn, just directly to the internet
tunel101 65.*.*.70 is a vpn peer in our production 2911. not being used in the comcast 2911 which we are troubleshoting until speed issue is resolved.
right now not going thru any vpn, just directly to the internet
Please try these and test again:
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
no  ip access-group 126 in
no zone-member security out-zone
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
no ip access-group 107 in
no zone-member security in-zone
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
no  ip access-group 126 in
no zone-member security out-zone
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
no ip access-group 107 in
no zone-member security in-zone
Also, I didn't see a NAT statement in the running-config. Would you please post that? We need to know how you are NATing from inside to outside.
ASKER
download speed remains the same after removing the commands. Â here is the nat
ip nat inside source route-map SDM_RMAP_3 interface GigabitEthernet0/0 overload
ip nat inside source route-map SDM_RMAP_3 interface GigabitEthernet0/0 overload
Would you please post a brief diagram of your setup?
ASKER
dont have any diagrams but right now Its pretty simple.
INTERNET<---COMCAST MODEM<---CISCO2911<---CLIE NT
INTERNET<---COMCAST MODEM<---CISCO2911<---CLIE
Thank you. So, Gig0/1 is connected to the Client when testing?
Please post:
1. Configs for Int Gig0/1
2. Result of "show interface gig 0/1" while the client is connected for testing.
Please post:
1. Configs for Int Gig0/1
2. Result of "show interface gig 0/1" while the client is connected for testing.
ASKER
show interface gigabitEthernet 0/1
GigabitEthernet0/1 is up, line protocol is up
 Hardware is CN Gigabit Ethernet, address is * (bia *                                      )
 Description: $ETH-LAN$$FW_INSIDE$$ES_LA N$
 Internet address is 10.*.*.1/24
 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit/sec, DLY 10 usec,
   reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
 Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
 Keepalive set (10 sec)
 Full Duplex, 1Gbps, media type is RJ45
 output flow-control is XON, input flow-control is XON
 ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
 Last input 00:00:13, output 00:00:13, output hang never
 Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
 Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 242
 Queueing strategy: fifo
 Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
   2820653 packets input, 1238818021 bytes, 216 no buffer
   Received 158754 broadcasts (0 IP multicasts)
   0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
   0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
   0 watchdog, 166 multicast, 0 pause input
   4483415 packets output, 1103057231 bytes, 0 underruns
   0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
   166 unknown protocol drops
   0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
   15 lost carrier, 0 no carrier, 74120 pause output
   0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
GigabitEthernet0/1 is up, line protocol is up
 Hardware is CN Gigabit Ethernet, address is * (bia *                                      )
 Description: $ETH-LAN$$FW_INSIDE$$ES_LA
 Internet address is 10.*.*.1/24
 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit/sec, DLY 10 usec,
   reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
 Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
 Keepalive set (10 sec)
 Full Duplex, 1Gbps, media type is RJ45
 output flow-control is XON, input flow-control is XON
 ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
 Last input 00:00:13, output 00:00:13, output hang never
 Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
 Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 242
 Queueing strategy: fifo
 Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
   2820653 packets input, 1238818021 bytes, 216 no buffer
   Received 158754 broadcasts (0 IP multicasts)
   0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
   0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
   0 watchdog, 166 multicast, 0 pause input
   4483415 packets output, 1103057231 bytes, 0 underruns
   0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
   166 unknown protocol drops
   0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
   15 lost carrier, 0 no carrier, 74120 pause output
   0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
ASKER
guptasan26:
cannot enter that command in the interface 0/0, invalid input
cannot enter that command in the interface 0/0, invalid input
ok..I see few drop at interface...but its fine as they are low...and crc error is 0 means not increasing..
first check:
ping 8.8.8.8 siz 1500 re 1000
if you find lots of drops..show me?
second point to note: on internet link you will not get speed what is on paper...
there is a mathematics..you will get only 1/8 th of speed..
means if I buy 20 mb link..then I will only get approx 2mb of upload speed...
first check:
ping 8.8.8.8 siz 1500 re 1000
if you find lots of drops..show me?
second point to note: on internet link you will not get speed what is on paper...
there is a mathematics..you will get only 1/8 th of speed..
means if I buy 20 mb link..then I will only get approx 2mb of upload speed...
Nothing is blaring. So, when you do a speed test like speedtest.net you get ~100Mbps. But, when you try downloading using the same connection you get less than expected; correct? Is this true for any download from any site, or certain sites?
ASKER
Haven't found any site with large files that can provide me with 100mbits download other than Microsoft so haven't tried any other site.
Guptasan: that understandable, and the correct case with most home connections, but not the issue with this specific business line. I CAN get the full line speed  down and up if I connect directly to the Comcast SMC branded modem.
From MS I downloaded a 1GB image in 1 minute at a constant speed of 11MBps
A 4GB image in 4 minutes at around the same speed as well. I tested these downloads multiple times and each time I got the same max speed thru the Comcast modem. On the Cisco, I did not achieve the same speeds, not even close.
I will load the router with its factory default config and see what I get. Will report back tomorow morning.
Guptasan: that understandable, and the correct case with most home connections, but not the issue with this specific business line. I CAN get the full line speed  down and up if I connect directly to the Comcast SMC branded modem.
From MS I downloaded a 1GB image in 1 minute at a constant speed of 11MBps
A 4GB image in 4 minutes at around the same speed as well. I tested these downloads multiple times and each time I got the same max speed thru the Comcast modem. On the Cisco, I did not achieve the same speeds, not even close.
I will load the router with its factory default config and see what I get. Will report back tomorow morning.
okay so here is the correct mathematic...
20Mbps is equals to 2,25Mbyte/sec (20=8x2,25)--download
20Mbps is equals to 2,25Mbyte/sec (20=8x2,25)--download
ASKER
yes, but 20 is my upload, download is 100
ASKER
so with a blank config its just a bit faster than with the whole production config but still cannot maintain a stable fast download
ASKER
weird. restored the same prod config we were working on and now the speed tests are inconsistent again. and still has all the stuff we did to make it better.
ASKER
switched everything to the cisco and the 100mbit lan and performance is HORRIBLE
we use veeam for replication to a vpn site and with the 10mbit line we had no issues and ping to that site stayed low (never more than 100)
with the Comcast im getting time outs and pings of 400+ to the vpn site. internet ping still ok.
we use veeam for replication to a vpn site and with the 10mbit line we had no issues and ping to that site stayed low (never more than 100)
with the Comcast im getting time outs and pings of 400+ to the vpn site. internet ping still ok.
ASKER
update.
switched the config to a different 2911 and its performing without any issues. ended up being a hardware issue..
I will still assign points accordingly based on how much it helped me with the issue.
 thanks a lot.
switched the config to a different 2911 and its performing without any issues. ended up being a hardware issue..
I will still assign points accordingly based on how much it helped me with the issue.
 thanks a lot.
Can you post the config?