<div>
<div class="content wysiwyg-content">
Hi all<br />
Here is a question i've been pondering. &nbsp;If i sizable amount of users remotely accessing a single remote App ( let say a glorified access program). &nbsp; Am i better off breaking up the dual hex server in to multiple vm and load balance RDS. &nbsp;or would the app perform better directly on the server itself.
</div>
</div>


Hi all
Here is a question i've been pondering.  If i sizable amount of users remotely accessing a single remote App ( let say a glorified access program).   Am i better off breaking up the dual hex server in to multiple vm and load balance RDS.  or would the app perform better directly on the server itself.

Rds (terminal services)  virtual servers or not

Hi all
Here is a question i&#39;ve been pondering.  If i sizable amount of users remotely accessing a single remote App ( let say a glorified access program).   Am i better off breaking up the dual hex server in to multiple vm and load balance RDS.  or would the app perform better directly on the server itself.

Windows Server 2008 and Windows Server 2008 R2, based on the Microsoft Vista codebase, is the last 32-bit server operating system released by Microsoft. It has a number of versions, including including Foundation, Standard, Enterprise, Datacenter, Web, HPC Server, Itanium and Storage; new features included server core installation and Hyper-V.

Windows Server 2008

Visual FoxPro (VFP), and its predecessor FoxPro, is a data-centric, object-oriented, procedural, database programming language and IDE from Microsoft last released in 2007 that still has some active use due to its low cost of deployment and fairly rapid development. In 2008, Microsoft released a set of add-ons for VFP's xBase components to allow interoperability with various Microsoft technologies. It allows data processing against its native file-based data tables or database servers such as SQL Server.