Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of cnit
cnitFlag for United States of America

asked on

Restricting Exchange Shared Contact list

I have a customer that wants to create a contact list of employees which would include personal cell numbers, home phone numbers, and other information that should not necessarily be available to all users with email.  Also, the contact list needs to be able to sync to their mobile devices.  

I haven't found a way to restrict access to specific attributes in AD or Exchange.  The closest solution I've found is GAL segmentation in Exchange 2010 SP2, however I don't want to remove the GAL functionality for regular users if  I don't have to.  

Is there an easy way to do this that I'm missing?
Avatar of Imtiaz Hasham
Imtiaz Hasham
Flag of United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland image

If it's a separate address list, it's doable but if it's the GAL / OAB, you cannot segregate the info.
So my suggestion, create a separate address book for it and assign permissions.
better you can create new offline address book and give the permission

Thanks
Hi Vijay,

It's precisely what I have advised but correct me if I am wrong, it would be assigned to an OU, correct?
Hi Ihasham,

Yes, Address list, offline address book and address book policy will be assigned OU level.



Thanks
Avatar of cnit

ASKER

Thanks for the input - I'll give it a try and update later today.  I guess I had thought that if I copied internal users to a new address book, the attributes would stay in sync with the contacts of the GAL.
They won't unless you create a new address book which is dynamic :)
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of Simon Butler (Sembee)
Simon Butler (Sembee)
Flag of United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of cnit

ASKER

I've been looking at Code2 Exchange Sync as well.   Add2exchange looks like does the same thing but the licensing for the number of users I need to sync with is nearly double the price of Code2.  Thanks everyone for your input.