Avatar of Dealer_Solutions
Dealer_SolutionsFlag for Australia asked on

BGP inbound for Class C - Preferences Not Taking Effect

Hi all,

Situation:
I have a class C public IP range that was allocated from Apnic.
ISP A = 40 Mb fibre connection
ISP B = 40 Mb fibre connection
Behind both ISP's connections we have a cisco 2801 router
Each router gets a default route only via BGP
Each router advertises our public IP range via BGP to the ISP's

We are attempting to preference ISP A over ISP B to get most of the traffic flowing over the preferred provider.

We have tried the following:

Item                                      ISPA                   ISPB
prepending                           None Set           6 x prepended paths
local pref                              Set to 300          Set to 100
local pref via community      Set to 100          Set to 90
MED                                      Set to 50            Set to 350

None of this works - we still get almost all traffic coming into ISPB connection.

Can anyone offer any suggestions on what we would need to do to get some of the traffic from ISPB to ISPA.
Networking ProtocolsInternet ProtocolsRouters

Avatar of undefined
Last Comment
Dealer_Solutions

8/22/2022 - Mon
arnold

ISP B likely has more interconnections which will explain.
The other option is that ISPA is not pushing/advertising your IPs or those with whom they peer are not rebroadcasting them.

Look at traceroute.org and looking glass project/bgpplay to see BGP convergence for your network.

http://traceroute.org/#BGP%20Tools
arnold

Just retread your post, why don't you terminate both ISPs on a single 2801?

And maintain the other as a backup.
pergr

MED is not relevant when load balancing between ISP, so you can skip that.

Local pref via community, would mean to influence the local pref in each ISP network. Are you sure you use the right communities?

If ISP A buy IP Transit from ISP B, then it may be tricky to get this to work.
Experts Exchange has (a) saved my job multiple times, (b) saved me hours, days, and even weeks of work, and often (c) makes me look like a superhero! This place is MAGIC!
Walt Forbes
surbabu140977

The reason local pref might not be working here because it is always for outgoing traffic for ibgp peers and incoming for ebgp peers. If you can satisfy this condition, local pref will/should work.

Since you have only stated that you have a public ip from APNIC and there is no mention about the AS(s) you are using, it will be difficult to visualize your scenario and offer a solution.
 
A jpg or a block diagram of what AS you are using and what is your hardware would point the answers more precisely towards a solution.

Best,
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
rauenpc

Log in or sign up to see answer
Become an EE member today7-DAY FREE TRIAL
Members can start a 7-Day Free trial then enjoy unlimited access to the platform
Sign up - Free for 7 days
or
Learn why we charge membership fees
We get it - no one likes a content blocker. Take one extra minute and find out why we block content.
See how we're fighting big data
Not exactly the question you had in mind?
Sign up for an EE membership and get your own personalized solution. With an EE membership, you can ask unlimited troubleshooting, research, or opinion questions.
ask a question
arnold

Testing ISPA feed using traceroute to experts-exchange.
and then sending the same traceroute via the ISP B interface
to see whether they take the same path as pointed earlier i.e. ISP B is the upsrteam/peering provider for ISP A.
naderz

Can you post your scrubbed bgp configs (and all related parts: ACLs, route-maps, etc.) please for both routers?
Get an unlimited membership to EE for less than $4 a week.
Unlimited question asking, solutions, articles and more.
ASKER
Dealer_Solutions

ISP B just got back to me and stated that they do not forward the community string outside of their own AS.

They strip the community setting the local preference to 90 and so when it hits the next AS the local preference is back to 100.

I am going to ask them to relax the policy however they have stated that the only way they will allow what I am proposing is to use conditional advertisements.

So it turns out it's not the architecture but the vendor...