Redundant Internet Connections on Cisco ASA 5505

I have dual ISP connections to my ASA with the monitor on the "outside" interface so that when it fails, it will switch to the second default route. This is great for outbound traffic.

I have an exchange server behind the ASA with the 192.168.X.X static of the Exchange box NAT'ed to one of the primary ISP's provided statics 51.2XX.XXX.XXX.

In the event of a failure of the primary ISP's WAN link, it would be nice if email would continue to flow to our Exchange server via he failover WAN link with a different group of static IP's. Is it okay to do that?

What I envision is adding an MX record with a higher value to the other routable static IP and then simply putting the NAT rule in for that.

Any suggestions on how best to do this?
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

Henk van AchterbergSr. Technical ConsultantCommented:
Your question has been asked here before but in a different context:

You can do what you would like to do, please take a look at the example config in the question above:

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
Pete LongTechnical ConsultantCommented:
Yep this is pretty normal, I've covered it here;
(See Point number 4)
Cisco ASA/PIX 8.x: Redundant or Backup ISP Links with VPNs

garyohAuthor Commented:
Guys, I sure appreciate this. Here's what I find at this point. My regular route is replaced as the default and the new route via the other ISP becomes the default route but no traffic is going out and my internet connection seems not alive. If I ping a known IP, it answers me so I know that part is working from the firewall upstream but from a pc inside the firewall. I don't have anything.

I thought the Access rules would need to be adjusted so I did notice there was no rule allowing data in so I just put an addttional rule in to allow all but it didn't get better.

What am I missing?
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Hardware Firewalls

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.