Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of ohmErnie
ohmErnie

asked on

Virtualize Exchange 2013 or not on single node?

We are currently running Exchange 2007 and have just purchased Exchange 2013 and new hardware to install it on.  We plan to upgrade directly from 2007 to 2013.

The server has two physical drives mirrored for the OS.  The other necessary storage volumes will be mapped up to our Compellent SAN which replicates these volumes to another location.

I am wondering if I am better off installing Exchange 2013 on a virtual machine that sits on a SAN volume, rather than installing it locally and having the database sit on the SAN volume.  This way I can replicate the entire virtual server to another location.  Seems like the best option, but looking for opinions as this is new to me.

The server itself will have Server Standard 2012 installed and would be using Hyper-V.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of Nick Rhode
Nick Rhode
Flag of United States of America image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of Amit
It depends upon your requirement. There are no hard and fast rules.
Yes, Virtual Machines give you far more benefits than physical machines.

e.g. Disaster Recovery and backup is one of them.