Forefront TMG 2010 Firewall Replacement

Hello, Experts!

We're currently using Forefront TMG 2010 for the 'Firewall Policy' feature only. I'd like to move to something that's going to be developed on (Microsoft announced they are mothballing Forefront).

I wanted to provide an explanation of what we use it for perhaps someone can guide us to a better solution.

1. We have limited external (public) IP addresses, but many internal resources that need to be made available externally.

2. On GoDaddy DNS, we've created DNS entries for our systems -- all tied to one external IP address.

3. On our Cisco Meraki firewall, we've created a 1:1 NAT rule that any traffic on selected ports (generally port 80) directed towards that external IP address assigned to our network should get routed to 10.0.0.XXX on our internal network.

4. At the 10.0.0.XXX address internally, we've installed Forefront that then routes traffic to/from different systems. e.g.: is is is

That way, if some externally requests, the site is up and available.

I'm looking for a new way of solving #4 above.

Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

btanExec ConsultantCommented:
if replacement is from MS Forefront suite, it likely be Forefront UAG. The latter is a Application Layer Gateway and is the solution for incoming access to internal resources from the Internet. Actually, Forefront TMG is installed during a Forefront UAG installation.


- Forefront UAG can be used to publish internal servers via Web portal or directly (similar to Forefront TMG). For website and VPN replacement use Direct Access, but do note that Direct Access is not a replacement of VPN in few scenarios, e.g. VPN for external workers who shouldn't access all services as company's workers. Of course we can implement several Direct Access implementations in one company, but external workers are enforced to have desktops in company's domain.

However, I see application delivery controller (ADC) will be way forward since you already going to consider replacement and I foresee such req as shared need more granularity and HA also...catch the below candidates - they can drill to web apps and have rule to customise outbound and inbound for that matter - but this really will be good to get principle advice before making decision...


F5 Networks

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
workforceinsightAuthor Commented:
Thanks, breadtan!

It's been a few months - does anyone know of any evolving technologies that would satisfy this need?
btanExec ConsultantCommented:
I wss thinking of SDN but probably too complicated to worth exploration.  I saw F5 route domain using smae ip but still treated as different domain. Another is different ports but it is not new and can be constraint with port exhaustion etc
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Microsoft Forefront ISA Server

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.