Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of Mark
Mark

asked on

USB Drive very slow

I have two identical, new, WDC WD30EZRX-00DC0B0 external, self-powered 3TB USB drives connected to each of 2 of what are supposed to be the USB 3.0 ports on my Gigabyte Technology GA-78LMT-USB3 motherboard. My system is running Linux Slackware version 13.37.0, kernel 2.6.37.6.

Copying from one drive to another seems very, very slow. It takes about 8 hours to copy a 190G file.

On the port closest to the mother board, initial command line pathname completion takes 20+ seconds. ls -ltr initiall takes 25+ seconds. likewise, df takes 15-ish seconds to return

On the port above that one pathname completion and ls are instantaneous.

By contrast it only took 4 hours to copy over 400GB to an identical USB drive on another computer (although not copying between USB drives).
 
Does 8 hrs for 190GB this seem reasonable for copying between USB drives?

Should both drives not be plugged into the same bus?

Does this seem like a problem with motherboard, drive?
SOLUTION
Avatar of Hardware_Guy
Hardware_Guy
Flag of United States of America image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of Mark
Mark

ASKER

Hardware_Guy: > Your drives might be a bit slower since they are pulling power from the usb port itself

The drives are self powered, not powered from the hub, so that shouldn't be a factor. According to my research, Linux has supported USB 3.0 since kernel release 2.6.31. This kernel is  2.6.37.6, so USB 3.0 should not be a problem. The mother board is new, purchased this summer.

I have determined that it is not the drive. I swapped out the drive that was taking a looong time to give me the `ls` listing, and replaced it with the drive from the different machine that apparently managed to copy 400GB in 4 hours (on the same version of Linux). Unfortunately, the looong `ls` and `df` times persisted. Interestingly, the "slow" drive is the one being read from, not the one being written to. I would think it should be the other way aroundI am running a copy right now to see if the files copy faster, but I'm not hopeful.

Could there be an issue with read/writing from/to drives on the same USB hub? Perhaps I should switch one of the drives to a different hub (which would be USB 2.0).

Thoughts?
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of Mark

ASKER

Hardware_Guy - thanks for participating!

EE: I solve the problem myself