[Okta Webinar] Learn how to a build a cloud-first strategyRegister Now

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 382
  • Last Modified:

hyper-v and disks (raid or not?)

Hi, if i have one server with Windows 2012 R2 and Hyper-V role on it, should i use RAID controller on the disks where the hyper-v host disks are? I did read somewhere that the disk must be setup with write through, but could i then use the file and storage service and use JBOD instead and have the same speed? Since it cant use a raid controllers ram to speed up, then what is the point using a dedicatet raid controller?
0
per-w
Asked:
per-w
3 Solutions
 
jpgobertCommented:
I'm curious about what the VM's you're wanting to deploy will be?  Are they production machines?  Are you planning to have more than one Hyper-V host server and cluster them or is this a single host deployment?

In any case you absolutely should use RAID if you have the option.  You probably read something that suggests disabling write cache for VHD volumes to prevent dirty shutdowns if you lose power.  In a single host situation where you're storing the VHD's on the host server it is a good idea to follow that suggestion.  Even with write cache disabled you'll still get better performance if you're running a multi-disk RAID array as you'll be spreading the I/O operations over multiple drives.  With that said, writes are just one part of disk activity... you still have read operations which will definitely benefit from both RAID and read cache.  

If you want to talk more specifically about what you're planning to do then post more info about your deployment and we can get more into details.
0
 
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2)VMware and Virtualization ConsultantCommented:
Yes, you should always be using a RAID configuration on ALL production servers, especially your hosts OS.
0
 
rindiCommented:
But, you should not use jBOD. That isn't RAID and you don't get any redundancy with it. jBOD only presents your disks to the OS as a large single disk. You also don't get any speed advantage with it (as opposed to RAID 0 and also doesn't give any redundancy), as with jBOD the data isn't distributed on several disks, but rather the first disk gets filled, then the 2nd, then the next. It is a little safer to use than RAID 0 though, as if a disk fails, you only loose the data on the failed disk, and not also the data on the others like you would with RAID 0.
0
 
per-wAuthor Commented:
I dont know how its in 2012, but in 2012 R2 you make a jbod with many disks. Then you make virtual disks and there you could tell if it should be Simple, Mirror or Parity. So the redundance is taken care of.

http://www.trainsignal.com/blog/storage-spaces-performance
0
 
per-wAuthor Commented:
dont seem to ve much info out there or not may that use 2012 R2. I ended up using windows 2012 R2 storage server and disks in jbod with virtual disks in mirroring and 10Gb card to Hyper-V server.
0

Featured Post

Prepare for your VMware VCP6-DCV exam.

Josh Coen and Jason Langer have prepared the latest edition of VCP study guide. Both authors have been working in the IT field for more than a decade, and both hold VMware certifications. This 163-page guide covers all 10 of the exam blueprint sections.

Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now