Still celebrating National IT Professionals Day with 3 months of free Premium Membership. Use Code ITDAY17

x
?
Solved

Sonicwall Port Forwarding Issue

Posted on 2013-10-29
1
Medium Priority
?
761 Views
Last Modified: 2014-01-15
We have a network with a Sonicwall TZ 215 firewall on it.

We have Two Networks

Internal Workstations Range 192.168.0.XX

Internal Camera Network 192.168.43.XXX

The Internal workstations are on the firewall (X0) Lan Port
The Internet Connection is on the firewall (X1) WAN Port
The Camera Network is on the Firewall (x2) Lan Port

We have 50 cameras on the 43 network, each listening on its own port (8100 - 8150) TCP/UDP

The vendor asked for port forwarding rules to be installed on the firewall to port a specific port to a specific camera (ex. Port 8100 would forward to IP 192.168.43.100, Port 8101 would forward to IP 192.168.43.101 etc.

We created service groups (TCP/UDP) for ports 8100-8150
We created Address objects for each camera on the network
We created the NAT Policy for each camera

When we tested to see if each port is open, only ports 8100-8103 are open all the rest are showing closed.  We checked and rechecked each address and service and they all are correct.  We checked to see if the closed ports are being used by any other service and they are not.

Any suggestions would be helpful

Thanks
0
Comment
Question by:mcgowray
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
1 Comment
 
LVL 10

Accepted Solution

by:
convergint earned 2000 total points
ID: 39610814
Did you create all these groups and objects manually?  I have found that with the Sonicwalls that using the built-in wizard is way better at getting the ports properly forwarded.  The wizard creates all the NAT addressing, objects and firewall rules automatically.

You can do it all manually but you should use the wizard once to create a new dummy port forward.  Then look at all the NAT (there are usually 3) and firewall rules that it creates to give yourself an idea of what was missed.  I can almost guarantee that either a NAT or firewall rule was missed in your configuration.
0

Featured Post

Take our survey for a chance to win!

As a valued customer of Targus, we’d like to ask you a few questions about us. As thanks, you will be automatically entered for a chance to win a $500 VISA gift card. To enter, just complete the survey by September 15, 2017.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

We sought a budget ($5,000) firewall solution that would provide all the performance we needed with no single point of failure.  Hosting a SAAS web application in our datacenter, it was critical that we find a way to keep connectivity up and inbound…
Imagine you have a shopping list of items you need to get at the grocery store. You have two options: A. Take one trip to the grocery store and get everything you need for the week, or B. Take multiple trips, buying an item at a time, to achieve t…
Monitoring a network: how to monitor network services and why? Michael Kulchisky, MCSE, MCSA, MCP, VTSP, VSP, CCSP outlines the philosophy behind service monitoring and why a handshake validation is critical in network monitoring. Software utilized …
In this video you will find out how to export Office 365 mailboxes using the built in eDiscovery tool. Bear in mind that although this method might be useful in some cases, using PST files as Office 365 backup is troublesome in a long run (more on t…
Suggested Courses

722 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question